Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Yesterday
  2. It's not possible to cherry-pick from the reference results I'm afraid. And when it comes to "similar systems", it's not easy to decide which one is similar to the current system. You could go by CPU vendor, number of cores, CPU socket, CPU clock, etc.
  3. I'd like to benchmark PC's with i5-6500, i5-7500T and i5-8500 and compare them with similar reference results. I'm getting an anoying long list from Sempron 2600+up to 20x Xeon/32x Opeteron. In Preferences I can either hide all benchmark reference results (can't compare at all) or only the best (still with very old/slow systems, no better systems to compare). How to get only reference results for similar systems?
  4. Good day! All my reports are placed in the database, but the problem is that I want to make a transposition of information, and from the item table where monitors are described for example, make a table reference for all monitors on computers. That is a unique reference table The problem is that it happens for some reason when two monitors are connected to the computer, but they differ slightly in characteristics (quite a bit, but they are still different) So I get this way I can not distinguish them as they are different monitors. I can determine their uniqueness by a set of values of certain fields, but in this case, as if the item table does not have a column with the number of the monitor instance (like ISequel), so that it was possible to group monitor instances by it
  5. Yes, you right... But for a day I suspect the operating system will collect from 2000 or more events of the Information type, and with the number of 5000 computers, I'm afraid that there will be a lot of records in the database, of which only 10% are needed
  6. Hm. And I can somehow pass my value there (RLocation or maybe even in RComment), for example through a parameter in the command line? For example, if I have a task run by policies, I would specify gpo_executor in the RComment field
  7. The current way is fine for us.
  8. RLocation was defined to help companies with multiple sites/locations manage their data. It's intentionally left empty so you can fill it up if you need that field for each report/computer.
  9. The background (automatic) report creation process is designed to not slow the computer down. In case your users have difficulties using their computers while the report is being created in the background, then I suppose those PCs must be very old and very slow anyway. Is that the case? BTW, you can use the /IDLE command-line option to change the process priority of AIDA64 to idle, which could help to improve user experience during automatic background report creation.
  10. It's not possible to assign an IID for everything that AIDA64 puts into the reports simply because then the number of IID's would be 100 times more than right now, and that would slow down the processing of reports by the Audit Manager and Change Manager modules of AIDA64. We keep adding new IID's on a case by case basis, per customer request.
  11. It's completely logical, because the target report file in that case would be a text file with the .ADO extension. In that file AIDA64 will put an error message in case the report cannot be inserted into the database. Due to e.g. SQL misconfiguration or such. If you don't want to have that output, you can specify a non-existing filename that cannot be created anyway, like C:\?
  12. It'd be best for you to put all Event Logs records into your database and then use SQL queries to filter them to your preferences.
  13. We do not have plans to enable such filtering for the Event Logs page. You seem to be a corporate user of AIDA64, so once you've collected the reports you can filter them by using any criteria you wish, using e.g. SQL queries.
  14. Is there a way we could make the procress easier for me to add the displays that are missing? And likewise easier for you to implement instead of having to type off a image?
  15. Last week
  16. Okay thanks for the info, Please let me know once a solution is available, thanks!
  17. It would be great if there was a possibility of filtering events is also additional by Source For example, I do not want to have a list of all event type Information, and want to have the event Source - MsiInstaller type (the type Information), and the Source - Microsoft Windows security auditing (type Audit) And that this Source type selection is not a Checkbox, but just a comma-separated string, for example: MSiInstaller, Microsoft Windows security auditing, Kernel-general, ... and etc.
  18. You have a useful option to generate a report based on Windows logs where you can specify how long it takes to display results. However, it is not possible to specify the number of days in the plan, for example, only the last 10,000 entries. In my case, I want to have all records from the MsiInstaller category in the report to log who installed / deleted which application. And everything seems to be fine, I can get it, but let's say that the report was generated when the computer booted, after which the user installed the application-worked in it and deleted it - and then went on vacation for 10 days, so the next time his computer turns on and generates a report, but without this data, because they do not fit in the range of 7 days. So unfortunately I can't find out about the actions taken
  19. Good day, I noticed a feature that I can't run the report generation in the database (/DATABASE) in the command line without specifying the /R parameter That seems to be illogical, because I want to enter data in the database, why should I specify a parameter that specifies the local storage of data
  20. Good day, you have a good field in the database for storing unique identifiers of different types of report variables. This eliminates filtering by word depending on the language used (and also protects in the future, if developers suddenly want to call the parameter differently) But unfortunately, not all your data has a unique identifier, and it's not even that the less popular categories are devoid of an identifier, but even those like the processor do not have one For example screenshot attached to topic
  21. Good afternoon, please add such an indicator as the time spent on generating the report. In my local network, when loading computers ( more than 3000 computers ), automatic report generation is started with uploading to the database, and computers have different characteristics, i.e. they are very weak, or with a large number of files, windows security events, etc. In such cases, there is not enough such a metric as the time spent on generating a report, on the basis of which we could understand where the computer is slowing down and the user is suffering Ideally, I see this as an additional field in the Report table (when uploading to the database)
  22. Good day! Please tell me what the RLocation field in the database means? I have always empty, and for the sake of interest where the information is taken put The RComment field, as I understand it, is the computer description field in the computer properties.
  23. In addition, HWiNFO64 displays SPD correctly, while AIDA64 cannot display SPD.
  24. This is how it looks in HWiNFO64:
  25. It's incorrect in AIDA64, but correct in HWiNFO64. See following pictures: I will provide more information if necessary. Thanks!
  26. Do you want me to reload the gauge as I was trying to run it (I have deleted it). I can rebuild on a fresh panel this afternoon and email you this afternoon. Let me know what you would like Thanks,
  27. Please copy your AIDA64.INI file as AIDA64.TXT and send me that file attached to an email. I'll send you my email address in private message.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...