Jump to content

Fiery

Administrators
  • Posts

    11182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    475

Posts posted by Fiery

  1. AIDA64 is still capable of monitoring such voltages, but please note that not all motherboards are capable of monitoring such voltage rails.

    Or maybe you mean the BIOS Settings section of the Motherboard / BIOS page? It should still be there, although please note that BIOS Settings cannot be detected on all motherboards, but only on Asus motherboards and on ones that supports Intel XTU.

    Regards,

    Fiery

  2. I guess the difference come from the fact that AIDA64 displays the real clocks for DDR memories, not the effective clock.

    DDR(1), DDR2 and DDR3 memories run at half the advertised frequency, so e.g. a DDR3-1600 module is actually running at 800 MHz real clock.

    DDR4 and DDR5 modules run at quarter the advertised frequency, so e.g. a DDR5-3200 module is actually running at 800 MHz real clock.

    Regards,

    Fiery

  3. It's not possible to reset your trial period, but you can request our Sales Department (sales AT aida64.com) to create a 30-day license for you that you can use to fully evaluate AIDA64. In your email to the Sales Department please specify the product you're interested in (AIDA64 Business Edition or AIDA64 Extreme Edition), your name, and your email address.

    BTW, you may need to enable RAID SMART support in AIDA64 / main menu / File / Preferences / Stability (and restart AIDA64) to activate disk drive temperature monitoring on your system.

    Regards,

    Fiery

  4. Yes, I saw that and wondered if it was not possible to make it appear in the OSD and Sensor Panel as well?

    We'll work on it ;)

    I have found that an application called SIW can also display the amount of power (in Watts) being drawn through the UPS.

    Would it also be possible to add that reading?

    Do you mean the Discharge Rate that is already reported in AIDA64 / Computer / Power Management page?

    If you mean something else, then please show us on a SIW screen shot if possible ;)

  5. I'm sorry, but we don't plan to implement FPS monitoring anytime soon. As for the rest (like Winamp, Skype, Media Player) I believe they're out of the scope of our software. Winamp, Skype and other 3rd party software should implement built-in support for G15/G19 LCD, or Logitech itself should provide a plugin in the Logitech G-Series LCD driver package. In fact, as far as I know, Logitech already provides support for at least Winamp, indicating the place in the song playing.

    Regards,

    Fiery

  6. Maybe it was due to some other BIOS settings caused either EIST, C1E or C-States to become enabled without you actually enabling it.

    As for the gadget issue. Please explain it in more details. Do you use the Sidebar Gadget feature of AIDA64, or the SensorPanel? Does the whole gadget/window disappear, or it just stops listing the values?

    Thanks,

    Fiery

  7. I'm afraid it's still the same issue. We've contacted Asus and requested permissions to gain access to their Thermal Radar programming manuals, but they're reluctant to provide such documentation to other companies. So we still have no documentation on the Thermal Radar hardware, and we cannot figure it out on our own :(

    If someone can explain how to activate the special Thermal Radar temperature readings without installing Asus Thermal Radar software, we would be glad to implement that in AIDA64.

    Regards,

    Fiery

  8. It's quite interesting, considering how very little things have changed between Build 1667 and Build 1700. Please try to disable GPU monitoring by right-clicking on the bottom status bar of AIDA64 main window --> HWMon Modules --> GPU. Let me know if it puts down the CPU utilization or not.

    BTW, in case after exiting AIDA64 the CPU utilization stays the same, it should mean the problem is elsewhere. Unless of course AIDA64.EXE process gets stucked in the running processes list after closing the application -- please check if that's the case.

    Thanks,

    Fiery

  9. I'm not sure what's wrong with the computer you benchmark, but many hardware reviewers from review portals think AIDA64 as a diagnostic software, and the benchmarks it offers are very useful and properly represent CPU and memory performance:

    http://www.aida64.com/testimonials

    Maybe if you could show us actual screen shots of benchmark results obtained with AIDA64 would help. Make sure to also explain what system it is, and whether it is overclocked or not. Please note that the reference benchmark results are always obtained on non-overclocked and non-tweaked systems, to represent "out of the box" performance of average PC systems.

    Regards,

    Fiery

×
×
  • Create New...