Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum
pck1980

CPU temperature on Gigabyte GA-AB350M Gaming 3

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm using the latest stable version of AIDA64 to monitor the system temperatures on my PC (Ryzen 1800X on Gigabyte GA-AB350M Gaming 3). Today, I noticed that AIDA64 shows strange values for the CPU temp, which I think started with a BIOS update from F2 to F4.

CPU Diode seems to show the same temperature as AMD's Ryzen Master, but with a 20-degree offset (which is intended for the 1800X, but the latest update of Ryzen Master removed that offset). The second CPU temperature AIDA64 shows (simply labled 'CPU') however is now completely messed up: When the system is idle, it sometimes goes down to values below 20 degrees Celsius.

It seems to me that it is always some 15 degrees below the temperature shown by Ryzen Master (which hopefully is the real one) and thus approx. 35 degrees below the value shown under 'CPU diode'.

It would be great if 'CPU' would show the real temperature (again) and if the 20-degree offset was removed from 'CPU diode'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest AIDA64 beta applies the -20 Celsius offset on the CPU Diode temperature reading for Ryzen 1600X, 1700X and 1800X processors.  We merely follow AMD's recommendation on how to handle the Tctl based temperature readings.  You can override that offset if you want, in AIDA64 / main menu / File / Preferences / Hardware Monitoring / Correction.  On that page you can also override the "CPU" temperature reading as well, BTW.

As for the "CPU" temperature reading, that one comes from the motherboard sensor chip.  The reading coming from that source depends on how BIOS configures the sensor chip at bootup.  Gigabyte never requested us to implement an offset for that reading, so we show the raw value as it comes from the sensor chip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the quick reply. Do you already know when the next stable update will be released that will include these changes?

Considering the CPU temperature, it seems that Gigabyte messed up something. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell which value the BIOS shows, as the CPU tends to get hotter there anyway. I'll have to have a look directly after system startup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎04‎. ‎17‎. at 0:44 PM, pck1980 said:

Thank you for the quick reply. Do you already know when the next stable update will be released that will include these changes?

Considering the CPU temperature, it seems that Gigabyte messed up something. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell which value the BIOS shows, as the CPU tends to get hotter there anyway. I'll have to have a look directly after system startup.

The next AIDA64 stable update is scheduled for May or June, although there are many factors that could delay that release, for example the recent changes in AMD and Intel CPU roadmaps.  But please note that our beta builds are considered "quite stable", so you should give the latest one a chance ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19.4.2017 at 3:30 PM, Fiery said:

The next AIDA64 stable update is scheduled for May or June, although there are many factors that could delay that release, for example the recent changes in AMD and Intel CPU roadmaps.  But please note that our beta builds are considered "quite stable", so you should give the latest one a chance ;)

 

Thank you for your reply. With the latest update, it seems that the "CPU diode" value doesn't include this offset any more. :-)

But for some reason, the "CPU" value is still 15 degrees below "CPU diode" (as it was with the previous version of AIDA64), so I'm now getting values of around 20 degrees here.

In other words: The value reported by the motherboard seems to have changed with the latest version of AIDA64 as well, which seems kinda odd...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎06‎. ‎20‎. at 10:50 PM, pck1980 said:

Thank you for your reply. With the latest update, it seems that the "CPU diode" value doesn't include this offset any more. :-)

But for some reason, the "CPU" value is still 15 degrees below "CPU diode" (as it was with the previous version of AIDA64), so I'm now getting values of around 20 degrees here.

In other words: The value reported by the motherboard seems to have changed with the latest version of AIDA64 as well, which seems kinda odd...

We don't use an offset for the "CPU" value.  AIDA64 should show the same value that Gigabyte's own monitoring software displays as "CPU" temperature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the Gigabyte software installed, so I can't tell what it reports. I'm just wondering that the CPU value is still 15 degrees below "CPU diode", despite the offset Ryzen adds to the temperature is now corrected.

Perhaps the latest BIOS update will fix this, but I still have to install it ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By Arctucas
      Just down loaded 6.00.5146 BETA and noticed these temperature sensors.
      What are they for?
       
    • By Droiyan7
      Ryzen infinity fabric for ZEN and ZEN+ (Ryzen 1X00 series and 2X00 series) make memory overclock more useful but complicated.
      Sometimes, overclock fails even if both memory modules and memory controller works well but infinity fabric fails.
       
      There are claims that AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark is useful to see if that happens.

      If L3 performance significantly lower before overclock, it is fail even if every other test(Testmem5, HCI Memtest, Linpack, etc...) succeed. Because Ryzen (exclude APU) 1X00 and 2X00 series have distributed L3 cache across 2 CCX which connected by infinity fabric, infinity fabric fails affect L3 cache performance.
      So......how about allow us repeat L3 bench only (N times or time basic) ?
       
       
      Or, maybe adding options to see L3 performance results in already exist cache stress test ?

       
    • By Feklar
      Hi again Fiery. Got this new Maximus XI Extreme Z390 . All sensor readings appear to be there  except for the vrm and pch sensor.  There is a sensor reading for the motherboard but the other two are missing. I have attached the isadump and ecdump files for you to work your magic. Thanks in advance for any help.
      ecdump.txt
      isasensordump.txt
    • By KallAdam
      Hey AIDA64 Team, 
      do you have any Timeline to integrate the Water_IN_Temperatur & Water_OUT_Temperatur for the new Z390 ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) ???
      Thank you!
    • By slyphnier
      Hello everyone
      i just receiving oreo update for note8 device few days ago
      i often use aida for temperature monitoring, but since the update it no longer showing the SoC/CPU temp
      it still showing battery and AC temp
      is it know issue ? (planned to be fixed in next update) or there is away to make it work just like before ?
      on 7.1.1 everything was showing properly
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...