I am encountering this very strange bug. If I use Aida64 Cache&Memory Benchmark in Windows 10 I get a specific Ram benchmark result, let's say 48100 MB/s read / 53600 MB/s write / 47700 MB/s copy and 52 ns latency. However, if I am booting from an USB live Windows 10 CD (WinPE), I am getting drastically better results, such as 55000 MB/s read / 61300 MB/s write / 55000 MB/s copy / 45 ns latency.
I am not changing any bios / RAM XMP / Ram memory timings settings between reboots, only booting from either main Win 10 installation or WinPE 10 live usb. I am using the same Aida64 version in both cases.
I am scratching my head, what can explain the huge difference between the results? In both cases, cpu usage is idle and no other background programs are running when doing the tests.
I'm using the LCD in my keyboard and Aida64 to monitor certain system values.
I've noticed that the CPU util percentages are not correct on the LCD display.
The most obvious is that when the system is completely idle (CPU util.png), The LCD will never show a lower number then 28% for CPU7 Utilization (LCD CPU util.png) on the LCD.
The other numbers are also weird or incorrect but that is more of a feeling i have. The other CPU utils feel weird because i never see 1% or 2%. It's always 10%, 11%, 12%, 14%, 22%, 28% etc. but never below 10% except 0%
As shown in "CPU util.png" Aida64 is capable of getting the correct percentages, it just does not show them on the LCD display in my keyboard
The CPU Temperature on the AsRock B550M Steel Series is incorrectly reported.
Ryzen Master reports 86C while AIDA64 reports 46C
MSI AfterBurner (RTSS) reports it correctly.
I know its a brand new chipset, I'm not worried about it, just wanted you to know
Hi all, I created a new pc with GEFORCE GTX 1650 SUPER VENTUS XS OC graphics card but when I start aida64 in the gpu section it tells me that it is a GEFORCE GTX 1650 SUPER AERO ITX OC. I just wanted to report this little bug hoping it will be fixed in the future. thanks and good job.