Jump to content

Dragolar

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dragolar

  1. Hi, I have but together a new PC, so i thought i would find the over-clock limit of my old PC :rolleyes:

    I finished some stability tests after over-clocking my old PC. I tested it with Intel Burn Test and Prime95, both went without any errors. Both have been going for several hours each.

    So i thought i test with Aida64, but after 7 min. with Aida64 System stability test, i got BSOD. if i lower BCLK the Aida64 Stress test goes just fine. (I don't dare increase voltage anymore)

    If it's unstable, shouldn't both Intel Burn Test and Prime95 detect that?

    I also noted that the temp got a few degrees higher with Aida64, than the two other tests. 65C. After 7 min of Aida 64, vs. 63C on both Intel Burn Test and Prime95 after hours.

    (read all temps with Aida64 if that matters at all, not that 2 degrees DOES matter :P ).

    So I'm left wondering if Aida64 is better to test stability and temp than the other two, or is it just that my PC don't like the Aida64 stress test?

    I wont bother trying to get 12h of Aida64 stress test flawlessly, if its just some weird hiccup from Aida64 <_< (get BSOD every time i try it, and only with AIDA64)

    Or if they have just made the best torture test, my hats of to the Aida64 team :D

    Or i just have to conclude that my computer have developed a sense of humor, and wants to fu** with me :blink:

    And if Aida64 Stress Test is better, should i just skip Intel Burn Test and Prime95 in the future?

    Everywhere i read people recommends mainly Intel Burn Test or Prime95 and a few others. Never seen Aida64 been recommended.

    Anyone else noticed any of this?

×
×
  • Create New...