-
Posts
70 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by FatBoyNL
-
Thanks. Got the Black Friday 2025 deal this morning and was very pleased to see that the regular renewal discount on top of that just made an even sweeter deal for me ππ
-
I'm also looking to get a new Extreme license for another 2 years. But I can't find the Black Friday discount anywhere... I just re-subscribed to the Newsletter, maybe I missed something?
-
Incorrect summary caΡhe 3 lvl for CPU AMD Ryzen 9950X3D
FatBoyNL replied to Pavel's topic in Bug reports
nvm -
fixed: Unknown motherboard (Asus TUF Gaming B650E-E WiFi)
FatBoyNL replied to kajmik01's topic in Bug reports
Is this a fresh Win11 installation? If not, did you properly uninstall and re-install all AMD chipset drivers? -
Haha. Thank you as well for this fix, and adding these extra extra OpenAL extensions π I'll have to check if all 'Soft n Loki' OpenAL extensions actually work as intended or advertised. Not exactly familiar with those yet. I noticed to see different Soft OpenAL32 DLL files in some game folders (STALKER Enhanced games, for example).
-
That just seems to work 'kinda' for the top 3 check boxes: most features still seem to be missing. I had the same result when I put the 64-bit sens_oal.dll file in the system32 folder, and renamed it to OpenAL32.dll π
-
When I first installed Win11 (and OpenAL), I noticed EAX wasn't available in supported games at all in the first place. And OpenAL info was missing in the old AIDA64 (32-bit). But I'm pretty sure I managed to solve both issues by replacing the (mixed-up) wrapper DLL (sens_oal.dll) files with the correct 32- and 64-bit versions (extracted from the original installer) in the appropriate folders. Can't the new 64-bit AIDA64 just "load/read/use/etc" the wrapper DLL (sens_oal.dll) instead of OpenAL32.dll for obtaining the correct OpenAL info?
-
Just return the PC to the shop where you bought it. Have them fix it properly or ask for your money back.
-
-
Just noticed that the Multimedia > OpenAL window in AIDA64 doesn't show the correct OpenAL Extensions anymore in the latest 7.99 beta build(s). I'm using a Creative Sound Blaster ZxR sound card. EAX effects are still working in supported games though, so this must a bug in the latest beta(s). I attached 2 screenshots showing this issue in AIDA64.
-
Can't this be solved by using only both Temp Sensor values (and just leave the 'Temperature' value) and use them as T(high) and T(low) for determining the actual output values as shown by AIDA64? But for all Samsung NVMe drives only maybe? I don't know whether all other NVMe drives from all other manufacturers are using the same SMART data for temperature readings like this. Or is that about exactly what you're saying? That would make completely sense and I guess then we'll have to wait for new firmware like you said. EDIT: I think see your point now. Most programs like CrystalDiskInfo would use just 'Temperature' for their one-and-only Temp reading, so that should be the primary reading whatsoever. And then there's 'another' reading, but which one of the two... That's a problem. Still think this can be solved by simple math though π Meanwhile, do you know any higher-tier support contacts over at Samsungs btw? I would like to offer my (nagging) skills to contact them about this, but I have the feeling their AI Support Chatbot just wouldn't understand me in that First Encounter π
-
Looking at the SMART table for the Samsung SSD 9100 PRO, there are 2 different Temp Sensors on this SSD - which are showing 2 different values in SMART. AIDA64, Samsung Magician and HWinfo64 all confirm this in their included SMART tools. I guess they are to be used separately, one for the controller and one for the memory - of which the controller probably has the highest temp. NOTE: There is also 1 separate Temperature value in SMART, that shows the readout of only 1 of the 2 Temp Sensors. But in the Computer > Sensor page in AIDA64, both temperatures reported for the 9100 PRO are always shown to be exactly the same - no matter what the usage is. So it seems only 1 of the 2 different temperature sensors is used to show 'both' temperatures for the 9100 PRO in AIDA64. I think this currently incorrect in AIDA64 for the 9100 PRO, as my other Samsung SSD 990 PRO does show two different temperatures in AIDA64 on the Computer > Sensor page, with the temperatures shown from both Temperature Sensors. I attached some screenshots for clarification. Could you please look into this? EDIT: By the way, it seems that Samsung has 'switched' Temperature Sensors 1 and 2 for the 9100 PRO, as opposed to those on the 990 PRO. Maybe that is the root cause of this issue? I mean, AIDA64 could be showing "Temperature" and "Temperature Sensor 2" for both the 990 PRO and the 9100 PRO - which would cause the 9100 PRO to show one and the same value (by mistake).
