Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum

OBI_1

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About OBI_1

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. CPU Queen- 1672 FPU Julia- 480 Very bad, I guess... May be I will downgrade to Windows Vista. There's something wrong with the "7" and this notebook.
  2. Some new info: I put back the stock Celeron CPU and the results are even worse. So the problem is, because of the notebook and windows 7- originally is with Vista. But with two comletely different installations (fist 32-bit, second 64-bit), the result are awful. When I have time, I'm gonna give u that scores. I am very curious, what's thu bug
  3. Read carefuly! My English isn't so good, but I wanted to be as detailed.
  4. 1. This isn't, I tried with low frequency 6x (1ghz) and result was even worse. 2 I don't Think so. The temperatures are in norrmal. When i tested, there wasn't throttling. 3. I already tried to close any aplication and any closeable process and there wasn't any improvment. The results is the same every time. Only caches latencies are different sometimes but still bad. It's connected with the no stock CPU and Windows 7 but what's the problem exactly don't know. Best regards' Svetoslav
  5. Hi, I have this hyper strange problem: I have notebooks:Toshiba sattelite A205-S5000 and Acer Extensa 5220 both with Chipset GL960 and Celeron CPUs (originally). I have one C2D T5550 and used it with the Acer and win XP without any problem.I decided to put it in the Toshiba, that was with win 7 x86 ultimate and Acer stayied with the Celeron. When I try the benchmark, there were a terrible result. I changed the HDDs (thats from Acer with XP to the Toshiba and that from the Toshiba with win7 to Acer). The results on the Toshiba with t5550 with XP from the Acer were perfect and the results on the Acer with Celeron and win 7 from the Toshiba were perfect too. I thought that there is a problem with the win 7 32 and installed win 7 64 with the same key. The windows is activated all deivers are installed and everything works good. But the problem with the benchmark wasn't solved. The latencies of L1 and L2 cache are different every time. What can be my problem. I hate unlogical problems and don't see a reason. Pleese help me or just tell me is this problem reflects on the performance of the machine or It's just mistake. One screenshot of my result: and one normal result:Even my normal L2 latency with the XP is 4.3
×
×
  • Create New...