Dutch
-
Posts
145 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Dutch
-
-
lol, don't you ever sleep
Yes, temps & rpm and also their MPS Sensors info - flow rate, reservoir level, pressure, etc. http://shop.aquacomputer.de/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=mps&x=0&y=0
But I believe the MPS sensors may only work with the Aquaero 6 versions... the 6 is a major upgrade over 5. http://forum.aquacomputer.de/weitere-foren/english-forum/103573-new-aquaero-6/
Edit: The MPS sensors work with the Aquaero 5, my bad.
Added a screen shot:
-
1
-
-
I have an AquaComputer Aquaero 6 PRO and use their Aquasuite to control and monitor my water cooling system.
It would be a great boon if I could monitor the water cooling system via AIDA64... control may be left to Aquasuite as it is generally only done at setup.
Aquaero 6 PRO: http://shop.aquacomputer.de/product_info.php?products_id=3092
Aquasuite & Aquasuite SDK downloads: http://aquacomputer.de/software.html
-
Thank you.
-
I need to move Aida64 Extreme from my old system to my new build.
Do I simply uninstall on the old, and reinstall on the new?
-
I'm still getting the "Thread creation error" occasionally...
------[ AIDA64 v4.00.2770 Beta ]------
------[ Microsoft Windows 8.1 Professional 6.3.9600.16452 (64-bit) ]------
------[ Motherboard Info ]------
Motherboard ID : 66-2776-009999-00101111-031911-TYLSBURG$A7522800_A7522IMS V8.15 031911
Motherboard Model : MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)
Motherboard Chipset : Intel Tylersburg X58, Intel Nehalem
DMI MB Manufacturer : MSI
DMI MB Product : MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)
DMI MB Version : 3.0
DMI MB Serial : To be filled by O.E.M.
DMI SYS Manufacturer: MSI
DMI SYS Product : MS-7522
DMI SYS Version : 3.0
DMI SYS Serial : To Be Filled By O.E.M.
DMI BIOS Version : V8.15
------[ Video Adapters ]------
Asus GTX660 TI-DC2 Series [10DE-1183 / 1043-844E]
------[ Video Driver ]------
nvapi.dll: 9.18.13.3221
nvd3dumx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvd3dum||9.18.13.3221 - nVIDIA ForceWare 332.21|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221
nvd3dumx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvd3dum||9.18.13.3221 - nVIDIA ForceWare 332.21|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221
nvd3dumx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvd3dum||9.18.13.3221 - nVIDIA ForceWare 332.21|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221
nvd3dumx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2umx||9.18.13.3221|||nvd3dum||9.18.13.3221 - nVIDIA ForceWare 332.21|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221|||nvwgf2um||9.18.13.3221
------[ Sensor Profiling (Init) ]------
SensorInfo : 89.271 ms
GPUSensorInfo : 8.345 ms
GPU01 / NV Diode : 0.009 ms
GPU01 / NV Fan PWM: 0.599 ms
HDD : 0.036 ms
SPD : 0.771 ms
AMB : 0.001 ms
Asus EPU2 : 0.001 ms
Asus EPU1 : 0.000 ms
nVIDIA SPP : 0.000 ms
nVIDIA MCP : 0.000 ms
Intel GMCH : 0.000 ms
Intel PCH : 0.003 ms
Intel SNB : 0.053 ms
Zambezi : 0.000 ms
Kaveri : 0.001 ms
AMD SVI2 : 0.001 ms
MTC0303 : 0.000 ms
Smart Battery : 0.000 ms
HID UPS : 19.643 ms
TVALZ : 0.001 ms
T-Balancer : 0.001 ms
Asetek LC : 0.001 ms
F718xx : 0.149 ms
Odin : 0.000 ms
------[ Sensor Profiling (Last) ]------
SensorInfo : 117.734 ms
GPUSensorInfo : 13.234 ms
GPU01 / NV Diode : 0.011 ms
GPU01 / NV Fan PWM: 0.823 ms
HDD : 0.066 ms
SPD : 1.344 ms
AMB : 0.001 ms
Asus EPU2 : 0.001 ms
Asus EPU1 : 0.000 ms
nVIDIA SPP : 0.000 ms
nVIDIA MCP : 0.001 ms
Intel GMCH : 0.001 ms
Intel PCH : 0.003 ms
Intel SNB : 0.046 ms
Zambezi : 0.000 ms
Kaveri : 0.000 ms
AMD SVI2 : 0.000 ms
MTC0303 : 0.000 ms
Smart Battery : 0.000 ms
HID UPS : 19.717 ms
TVALZ : 0.000 ms
T-Balancer : 0.000 ms
Asetek LC : 0.001 ms
F718xx : 0.164 ms
Odin : 0.001 ms
-
I have an older MoBo (MSI X58 Pro-E) and I don't believe I installed additional software when I built the system.
Driver list attached (It's .csv format for Excel, but I had to append .txt to upload here)
Edit: attachments deleted
-
I just had the "Not enough Memory..." error again WITH the picture still displayed on the SensorPanel.
I had moved the picture file to the same folder as the program file.
Additionally, this time I am not able to start AIDA64 to exit, and the SensorPanel is not updating.
I guess that means a system reboot.
If I can locate the build prior to 2752 it will install it to see what happens.
-
Let me preface this by saying I am a driver, I do not get under the hood, so technically speaking I am a noob
.That being said, I saw this option couple days ago when I was poking around and thought I would share in case it is useful:
Right click on Aida64.exe (not a link),
at the bottom of the options listed should be "Properties"... click it,
select the "Compatibility" tab,
at the bottom is an option "Run this program as an administrator"
No idea if this is useful, and I have Win8.1/64, but maybe it's available with Win7/64.
Edit: attachments deleted
-
Not sure if I should take this to a new thread, as the error is different from the OP. If so I will let Fiery move it.
I just experienced the "Thread creation error: Not enough storage..." again, and again the picture file was not showing on the SensorPanel.
The picture file is on a different drive than the Aida64 program files, but it is not a removable drive.
I exited Aida64 and restarted and now the picture is on the SensorPanel.
I can move the picture to the Aida64 directory... not sure if that makes a difference.
-
Am I the only person experiencing these issues
I have experienced a different error since build "aida64extreme_build_2752" was installed yesterday.
When I went to check the status of the "Enable CPU throttling measurement", I got it again when I clicked on "Preferences"... every time.
After restarting Aida64 I was able to proceed and confirm that CPU Throttling was NOT selected.
This may be totally coincidental, but I noticed the one .jpg file I use on my SensorPanel was not displayed. After restarting it was displayed and I did not receive an error when checking the CPU Throttle status.
Edit: attachments deleted
-
Thank you for the reply. I should not have muddied the water with the gradient request, I was actually more interested in a border... but I understand the limitations of a decreasing market and ever present user requests.
By the by, I renewed updates for 3 years on the Black Friday mailing you sent out... thank you for that.
-
I have stopped using an image for my SensorPanel background and am simply specifying a backgrund color on the setup page. I was wondering if an option for a border could be added where one specifies the background color and the panel size.
If possible, a gradient between two colors would be pleasing also.
Edit: The gradient suggestion would be for the background, not the border.,, just to remove ambiguity.
-
I would not complain about one time ads at installation, unless it were implemented to default install software with the user HAVING to opt out (i.e. the Ask Search toolbar).
I am more concerned about the much too intimate relationship between Google and the NSA (National Security Agency - think Edward Snowden). I am not saying NSA back-doors are installed on a system running Google software, but prudence and caution require I allow for that possibility.
I live in the United States and the NSA scares the holly bejeezus out of me.
-
-
Understood. Sad for all these rendering issues with compiler I;m guessing.
I know y'all are busy, but one follow up question if I may - is the Alerting Function improvement still a consideration?
Thank you.
Dutch
-
Fiery???
-
Yes, it's still under consideration, but as I've said, putting anything dynamically on the SensorPanel is not easy, especially when it is a hovering bubble. We don't think a static place to display such information is a good idea, but a hovering bubble would be best. Coming up with a proper rendering solution for that is a true challenge, since it would have to be indepent of the regular SensorPanel updates. For example, if you configure a 5 seconds update frequency for the SensorPanel, the hovering bubble has to be updated between 5-second panel updates to make it "smooth". We'll work on it, but right now we're inundated with things to do about the next AIDA64 stable release
It's been a year, and i thought I would check if this is still being worked on?
Thank you.
Dutch
-
Looks very useful, thank you.
-
In case anyone else desires an Internet Activity Monitor, the gadget, "Network Meter" is excellent.
http://addgadgets.com/network_meter/ does it all, including total usage for a user defined period (day, week, month, year) and MUCH more.
If you have Win 8 installed, the utility http://8gadgetpack.net/ (free) allows one to run gadgets on Win 8,
N.B., it does not work on Win 8.1 yet, but that is under development.
This should tide one over until the brilliant lads here get a chance to develop additional features into the best monitoring program out there.
-
I am looking for a utility that keeps track of my internet activity. To date i have found nothing that functions on Win8, There are probably options for system admins running multiple devices, but that is more than i need/want.
Since AIDA64 already reads Total Download and Total Upload for a session, is it feasible to have AIDA64 log the session values for up/downloaded data when it closes, and then read the data on start up? With a user defined term function, day, week, month, year, it would be possible to display usage for the desired term.
-
Indeed, sexy splash screen
-
Dont understand what *Looks for a 'Like' button to click* means.
Was a reference to the Facebook Thumbs-Up Like Button seen often, meaning I agreed.
-
Quick thought. It would be very useful to be able to have more than one sensor panel. ie, indefinite number (within reason ofcourse) independent of each other.
Particularly for those of us using multiple monitors
*Looks for a 'Like' button to click*
I believe Aida64 users should be able to place any object anywhere on the available desktop. Set a clock (with predefined templates) here, set a graph there and place some bars or values elsewhere. Don't get me wrong, I love SensorPanel and it auto-loads on my system, but it feels limited and restrictive.
My sense is that Aida64 is geared toward Geeks, Overclocking Gamers and System Admins at the moment. If the frontend (SensorPanel) was made more flexible with presets, templates and various eye-candies, Aida64's overall market share for this genre of programs would grow greatly.
Currently if I have an alert set and it triggers, I have no control where the notice window pops up... if in the middle of a battle in some MMORP, I get a box slammed in the middle of my screen... not conducive to what I was doing. What would be pleasant is if multiple alerts could list into a user defined and placed scrollable window, with auto-removal if the item drops below the alert level
I love Aida64 and I adore the developers and their responsiveness. These comments are from the heart, and intended to continue the discussion.
Edit:
I should also be able to right click on a displayed object and be taken directly to a window that allows me to change settings for that object.
I know, this is full blown programing toward the front end, but that's exactly what I am talking about.
-
A feature that dynamically turn on Auto-scale in certain conditions such as:
If Current value is greater than Maximum value then turn on "Auto-scale" on maximum value
and same on minimum value
and also if possible, apply this in Sensor panel Bars just same as above:
A feature that dynamically change max limit depending on current value in certain condition such as:
If Current value is greater than Maximum value then turn on change the max value depending on current value
also why not use percent in limit 1, limit 2... that depends on min and max??
Wish I explained it well, sorry for my language
I will not address the fixed scale to auto scale on threshold for graphing issue, but autoscalling on bars would yield a full bar all the time, as that is what auto scaling does. You need the history of a graph to make autoscaling useful.
Supported fans/temperatures cards
in General Discussion
Posted
On a similar but different note, the third and last application I have displaying system status parameters is Corsair Link. AIDA64 already reads most of the information, such as voltages, but there are a few PSU statistics not currently available. Particularly Power In, Power In Max, Power Out, Power Out Max, Efficiency, PSU Temperature, PSU Fan Speed and the Mains Voltage & Amperage.
Is it feasible to pick those up also?