Jump to content

Arctucas

Members
  • Posts

    316
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Arctucas last won the day on November 6 2021

Arctucas had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Arctucas's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

14

Reputation

  1. Another BETA today, still no sensor. If you are unable to implement the sensor, please just say so, and I will stop looking for it. Really do not wish to complain, but there are a lot of basically useless sensors that are implemented, and one that is actually useful cannot be? My current license is good until 2026. Perhaps by then, I can have that sensor? Regards
  2. Another BETA today, still no response to my request...
  3. See there is a new BETA today, was hoping you were going to be able to implement the sensor. Maybe next BETA?
  4. Was wondering if you were going to be able to add the sensor I requested?
  5. Would it be possible to add the current (Amperes) reading on the MSI Ace Max Z790 motherboard. HWiNFO says it is on a Renesas RAA229131 chip.
  6. I believe it is 100(%)÷5000(RPM)=.02 100(%)÷3000(RPM)=0.3
  7. Almost forgot about this. 3 months, 900+ views and not one comment? No-one else would find this useful?
  8. Really strange. So, two AMD CPUs (5900X) have temp increase with AIDA64 running, while my Intel (9900K) has no increase.
  9. Is it possible to display ∆T° in the System Stability Test Statistics page?
  10. Interesting. I see virtually no difference in CPU temps with Sensor Panel active and with rig at idle (only default Windows applications running). I see an increase in CPU usage for AIDA64 from fluctuating between .01% and .78% with AIDA64 running without Sensor Panel active, to between .01% and 1.94% with Sensor Panel active. This is with Update Frequency for Sensor page, Sensor icons, and SensorPanel all set to 100ms. Not sure if there is any setting other than Update Frequency that would cause higher CPU usage, which generally is what causes higher temps.
  11. According to the chart provided by Alpha, @857 RPM the flow would be ~209 L/H. I have no clue as to the Flow Sensor reading, perhaps Asus could answer what is happening there? Frankly, I never had faith in any Asus software, but that is just me.
  12. Say you have 1100 rpm when you connect the flow sensor to a fan header. That would be ~255 L/H. In AIDA64 you would determine which fan header was reading the flow sensor, Preferences>Correction>New Fan (X), To convert RPM to L/H, (255÷1100 = 0.231....) Enter .231 in the ratio field, and you should see 255 value reported by that sensor in Sensor Panel. Then rename the Fan to Flow or whatever.
  13. https://www.alphacool.com/download/ENG_1019925_Alphacool_ES_flow_and_temperature_indicator_HighFlow_with_RPM-signal_(flow-measurement).pdf Determine the RPM and do the math?
×
×
  • Create New...