Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Grestorn last won the day on October 13 2015

Grestorn had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About Grestorn

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

2623 profile views
  1. Wow. I'm sure I've looked at this at some point in the past. Totally forgot that this was there. Sorry for bothering you! And thanks a lot for adding the HighFlow Next support!!!!
  2. No, I'm not. I don't know how the export works actually, but something has changed obviously, since it used to work. My guess would be that you've changed the name of the exported field, so the Aquasuite doesn't recognize it anymore. Is there anyway to check the actual values exported? I can get into touch with Aquacomputer, but I need as much info as possible. Also, while we're talking about the Aquasuite: Are you planning on adding the new devices to your data import? Like the High Flow NEXT which has been introduced a couple of months ago?
  3. Yes, I don't doubt that it's there - I never did (see my original posting). The problem is, that it's no longer exported to the Aquasuite! That's my actual problem
  4. I'm using the AIDA64 data in the Aquacomputer Aquasuite. Since the last version(s) the value for the Ampere (RTX 3090) GPU temperature is no longer listed there. They suspect this to be a problem on AIDA's side. Since the value is still displayed in the AIDA64 sensor page, I presume that it might be a problem with the export? Here the values imported from AIDA in the Aquasuite:
  5. Thanks, Fiery. And I totally agree. But since digital PSUs are still a bit of a rare curiosity, I doubt that will happen anytime soon.
  6. I've been using digital PSU's from Thermaltake for ages now. I like how they can be monitored through AIDA64. Unfortunately, my current PSU "Toughpower iRGB PLUS 850W Platinum" has issues with my new RTX 3090. The occasional hard reset right when the 3D mode kicks in, most likely caused by the PSU acting too fast on a power spike caused by the 3090. So I want to replace the PSU. I'm a bit fed up with TT, I thought my PSU should be easily enough for the RTX 3090. I don't want to lose the monitoring feature of AIDA64, so I'd like to get an alternative which can be monitored.
  7. I don't need that checkbox right now, cause AIDA64 is used to monitor AC stuff at the moment. But in case I'd need a fast response of AIDA's monitoring, it would be nice if I could turn the AC polling off temporarily.
  8. Aquacomputer updated their Aquasuite the other day. With that update, they also updated the firmware of many of their hardware components, including the D5 Next to version 1014. Since that update, AIDA64 doesn't see the D5 Next's values anymore. HWInfo still sees them, though, so the export must work technically, there seems to be some misalignment between AIDA64 and the D5 Next. Other values of Aquacomputer's components are still showing up fine, only the D5 Next is affected (on my system). In that regard, I'd still very much appreciate if it would be possible, t
  9. I think this is not about averaging. It's about the issue that using a discreet multiplier to calculate the frequency is simply wrong for Ryzen. That's why Ryzen Master shows such a vastly different core frequency than AIDA64. In HWInfo shows an "effective CPU clock" for each core, which actually reflects the value Ryzen Master is showing. See this: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/effective-clock-vs-instant-discrete-clock.5958/
  10. Hi, after a very long time of using my old 5960x system and AIDA64 passively, I'm now building a new machine based on Zen 2, and because of that I'm interested in the latest developments once again. I've just read this article about issues with AMD Zen's CPU clocking mechanics: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/1usmus-power-plan-for-amd-ryzen-new-developments/ What stands out there is the statement of HWInfo's author, he claims that the "traditional" way of measuring a CPU (core) clock has several issues, which is something I've been wondering for quite some time myself
  11. I looked up the LCD profiling dump (rmb on the status bar, SensorDebug->LCD Profiling Dump). And I realized that there are things listed there, which I don't actually use: ------[ Versions ]------ Program Version : AIDA64 Extreme v5.92.4376 Beta BenchDLL Version: 4.3.759-x64 Windows Version : Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 10.0.16299.19 (64-bit) ------[ Motherboard Info ]------ Motherboard ID : <DMI> Motherboard Model : Asus Rampage V Extreme Motherboard Chipset : Intel Wellsburg X99, Intel Haswell-E DMI MB Manufacturer : ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. DMI MB Product : RAMP
  12. Well, if you're in need of suggestions for improvements... The possibility of moving more than one item at a time The possibility of changing certain values of more than one item at a time Faster z-Ordering (Drag&Drop) Option to select an item from the preview (like each click on a spot activates the next item down the z-ordering at that spot) Those come to my mind right away...
  13. Hi Fiery, I didn't know about that function. You learn something new every day... So, in my case it's the aquearo that takes almost all of the time. Is that a technical neccessity or something that could be optimized, either on your side or on the side of AquaComputer? Thanks! ------[ Versions ]------ Program Version : AIDA64 Extreme v5.90.4251 Beta BenchDLL Version: 4.3.741-x64 Windows Version : Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 10.0.15063.413 (64-bit) ------[ Motherboard Info ]------ Motherboard ID : <DMI> Motherboard Model : Asus Rampage V Extr
  • Create New...