-
Posts
469 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by tistou77
-
Hello I set the CPU Cache Voltage in "Offset Mode", and with AIDA64 it's the same voltage at idle and load In the bios, the voltage is lower Is this is a problem of reading of AIDA64? Thanks
-
Power Values (Core i7-5930K + Asus Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
Too bad, it is not serious Thanks Fiery -
Small bug Motherboard/Chipset (Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Bug reports
Thank you for your explanation This is not a problem, it was just to report -
Hello In this tab, there are 2 times the North Bridge: Intel Haswell-E IMC The 2nd is superfluous I think (but some values ​​are different) And in "Memory Slot" is indicated 2GB by "Dram Slot", but I have 4GB modules Thanks
-
Power Values (Core i7-5930K + Asus Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
It's ok with SVID Support enabled Damages whatsoever related, it's better to disabled it for the OC With SVID enabled, this indicated 117W in stress with AIDA64 (not the total power I guess) -
Power Values (Core i7-5930K + Asus Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
Yes, that's what I've seen on the ROG forum, I will test it while ago to see. -
Power Values (Core i7-5930K + Asus Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
The report cpuidmsrdump.txt Thanks for your great work -
Power Values (Core i7-5930K + Asus Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
With HWInfo, it's indicate 0.58xW (idle) and with HWMonitor it's the same Thanks Fiery -
Power Values (Core i7-5930K + Asus Rampage V Extreme)
tistou77 posted a topic in Hardware monitoring
Hello With a 5930K and Rampage V Extreme, is it possible to have the "real" Power Value for CPU Package? In load, this value is about 2W Thanks -
Ok, thanks Fiery
-
Ok thank you for your answer For the VRM temperature, the sensor is directly on the VRM I guess
-
Thank you for your answer And these icons will not be good? For the temperature of the cores and Vcore is the same icons, so for VRM, it could be the same
-
hello It would be better to put the icon of the "CPU VRM" for the temperature of the VRM. The battery icon does not seem appropriate It's just for design, nothing important to use Thanks
-
fixed: Asus Rampage V Extreme (X99) sensor issues
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
-
fixed: Asus Rampage V Extreme (X99) sensor issues
tistou77 replied to tistou77's topic in Hardware monitoring
With the last beta OK for CHA_FAN 1A but on CHA_FAN 1B, it does not work And not OK for temperature 2 et 3 (OK in the bios) -
Hello With the latest version, the temperature 2 and 3 are not shown in the monitoring (temperature only 1) And I do not have either CHAN_FAN1 And there is a misreading for Vcore to "load"? AIDA64 shows 1.264v while CPU-Z and HW Info indicate 1.249v Thanks
-
Hello Fiery 1) No 2) Yes, the last beta The problem appeared with the last 2 beta Thanks
-
Hello For some time, I do not have the Aida64 icon in the sistray A small bug? If I close and relaunch AIDA64, the icon appears Thanks
-
Ok, thanks so much for your help
-
Ok, everything is normal, then? Thanks so much
-
For me BFF D0A F00: Intel Ivy Bridge-E/EN/EP/EP 4S/EX - Power Control Unit 0 Offset 0E0: 18 36 00 00 00 0A 5F 00 40 9F 5A 00 40 9F 06 00 E0E is different (not Offset 0E0: FC 33 00 00 00 0A 5F 00 40 9F 5A 00 40 9F 06 00)
-
According to the Intel datasheet, the Tjmax is 91°C for Ivy Bridge-E other softs for monitoring indicate 91°C Who is good and who is not? Thanks
-
On the Motherboard / CPUID page, it's indicate 95°C, not 91°C
-
Hello The Tjmax IB-E is 91°C, I believe With the latest beta, the Tjmax is to 91°C ? With another monitor, set at 91°C, the temperatures of cores are lower (compared to Aida64) Thanks