All Activity
- Past hour
-
ytx2578 joined the community
- Today
-
K.M.S joined the community
-
does this work? the cpu/gpu/ram names you'll have to edit yourself since it's static text I made myself 480x1920 BW VERTICAL.spzip
-
zoubida joined the community
-
Alex_V joined the community
-
FaithFoul joined the community
-
same issue. using the latest beta version "v8.20.8116 beta" (licensed) this is my config: but after every reboot the SensoePanel is on DISPLAY1 instead of DISPLAY2 . Then I have to open the preferences screen ("Pin SensorPanel to monitor" still shows "DISPLAY 2: 1024 x 600" but the panel is on DISPLAY1) select "disabled" for the "Pin SensorPanel to monitor" setting then change it back to "DISPLAY 2: 1024 x 600" and hit apply to move the panel back to the correct display/postion. (only hitting "apply" without change to "disabled" and back to "DISPLAY 2" does nothing)
- 7 replies
-
- sensor panel
- reboots
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
benim0400 changed their profile photo
-
and another question - is the random read benchmark really random? I tested the HDD with the linear read and random read benchmarks (4 KB block), and in both cases I got 20 MB/s, which cannot be.
-
DeuX joined the community
-
Beny joined the community
-
Is there anyway you can share this? Anyway is very nice
-
محمود محمد started following COSTAJUNIOR
-
MakoHaze joined the community
-
محمود محمد joined the community
- Yesterday
-
Please add the display of the results not only in MB/s, but also in IOPs
-
adrdossan joined the community
-
-
Question about frenquencies displayed in benchmarks
MAA replied to frwho's topic in Benchmarking, system performance
In this case, you should be consistent and specify the base frequency for the processor under test. (you are currently displaying the turbo frequency) -
I'm sorry, but we do not deal with such displays that can be used as a secondary monitor. Theyt already work with SensorPanel.
-
Thanks you sharing- I was able to modify this to work with 2560x1440 (vertical monitor)
- Last week
-
Termor22 changed their profile photo
-
12V-2x6 monitoring on Thermal Grizzly WireView Pro II
Psychorama replied to ParisV's topic in Hardware monitoring
Same here! Would be great! -
Of course, I've already done that. It would be clearer if there were up to 8 pages. On my other PC, I have an 8" TURZX, and it's much clearer there. For now, I'll use the sensor panel and hope that this 7" LCD display will eventually be supported. Thanks for your work!
-
1024 x 600
-
What SensorPanel resolution are you using? (poll)
Devin Baines replied to Mice007's topic in SensorPanel
2560x720 (Corsair Xeneon Edge) -
The sensor panel is not displaying the information correctly.
Rafiusk replied to Rafiusk's topic in Bug reports
Hi AIDA64 Team, I tested a program that costs almost $250 (Engineer), encountered one problem and several others, reported one of them, and no one on the team could provide any clarification, not even a generic response. Sorry, but I'm not going to waste my money or my precious time with this company. No way! Unfortunately, you treat your users (customers) like prostitutes. No money, no attention! Sincerely, Rafael -
I searched, but I didn't find anything that I liked
-
Here are several https://forums.aida64.com/search/?q=1080*1920 &quick=1&type=forums_topic&item=13296
-
Hi everyone! Can anyone share a good topic about touch panel support with a 1080*1920 resolution? I've been searching for a long time, but haven't found anything good.
-
-
Incorrect memory freq/timings (Ryzen 9 9955HX)
MAA replied to MAA's topic in Benchmarking, system performance
It is unlikely that a single measurement of the memory frequency can significantly affect the benchmark result. In any case, you can increase the duration of the benchmark to reduce this impact. -
Fiery started following Incorrect memory freq/timings (Ryzen 9 9955HX)
-
Incorrect memory freq/timings (Ryzen 9 9955HX)
Fiery replied to MAA's topic in Benchmarking, system performance
It's not easy to capture the power state where the memory frequency is at the "right" level since during the benchmarks we cannot measure memory frequency (or any other system parameters) in order to avoid affecting the benchmark results. And apparently as soon as the system gets to a state that's close to idle, the memory frequency is quickly lowered on your configuration... -
Thank you, we will fix the remaining issue in the next AIDA64 beta update.
-
Thanks, NVMe drives are listed properly now in the Storage section in beta 8.20.8116 (released yesterday). However, NVMe storage disks are not visible in the Summary/Storage section yet.
-
Here https://forums.aida64.com/search/?q="600x1024"&quick=1&type=forums_topic&nodes=28
