All Activity
- Today
-
RiaEvag joined the community
-
Hello Wanted to share my Panel for 8.8" screen (1920x480). Its my first try and i want to keep it as simple and clean as i can. I know i could add more info but for me those are the most important. Maybe i will add clock speeds and voltage as well, but thats the current state now. I still dont like the bars, i try to change them to custom but dont know how yet, working on it. What i really like is the yellow and red indicators on CPU + GPU (and Board as well) if the temp rises to a specific "warning" and "critical" level. So if there is no color, everything is fine. I think thats also a very clean and simple approach. What do you think? Its not done yet... but like 80%
-
68Gamebai68 joined the community
-
-
itsprstar joined the community
-
serhatde23 joined the community
-
I’ve just sent you a private message. Please check your inbox.
-
Can someone please share this in 1024x600?🙏
-
bulutorhan joined the community
-
يوة joined the community
-
looks really fantastic brother, any chance of a 600x1024 version ?
-
razoom29 joined the community
-
s8onlinecasino joined the community
-
M3Q joined the community
-
Ballu joined the community
- Yesterday
-
Can You share that. Thank You
-
What screen do you recommend me to replace mine
Checki replied to PatrickP's topic in General Discussion
I have the turzx 8.8 screen and don’t see any performance issues. -
Any plans to support Thermalright TROFEO VISION 9.16 LCD?
Checki replied to Schakal's topic in General Discussion
Why don’t you just buy the turzx 8.8 screen? It’s basically the same and works. -
That's really cool, could you share it?
- Last week
-
I'm seeing the same thing on all four of my Samsung SSD's. There are two options in the sensor panel for the SSD's, but it's only the two identical numbers to choose from. So it seems AIDA64 is not actually picking the 2 temperatures out of the 3 that are not identical. In this screen shot I've highlighted the sensor readings from HWiNFO. The two temperature options you get in AIDA64 are the 1st and 3rd options shown in HWiNFO. I was able to verify this on my 'C' drive as you can see in this case the third number is actually different. When selecting the second (#2) sensor from AIDA64 it's actually showing the 42° of the third sensor in HWiNFO. It would be great to be able to see what's typically the hottest reading from my SSD's. According to Gemini, the second number is the controller temp: Gemini - "HWiNFO typically displays three distinct temperature sensors for Samsung NVMe SSDs (like the 970/980/990 Pro) to monitor different components: Drive Temperature (NAND/General), Drive Temperature 2 (Controller), and sometimes a 3rd sensor (often related to another component or a specific NAND zone). The controller (usually Temp 2) generally runs much hotter than the NAND flash."
-
-
chiphop started following No info on SSD Controller
-
Jobin Barbosa changed their profile photo
-
1024x600 Resolution 100 position gauge,absolutely new design OC dashboard panel available now!!! www.aida64skins.in
-
fixed: S.M.A.R.T. Current values missing in AIDA64 v8.30.8300
FatBoyNL replied to Viper7853's topic in Bug reports
Thanks for the explanation! Case solved then; I didn't realize that those SMART columns had always been empty for NVMe drives in the past.. 🫣 -
Any plans to support Thermalright TROFEO VISION 9.16 LCD?
Fiery replied to Schakal's topic in General Discussion
We couldn't make the existing module more reliable yet. We're still working on it... -
Any plans to support Thermalright TROFEO VISION 9.16 LCD?
Capybara replied to Schakal's topic in General Discussion
Any updates? -
fixed: S.M.A.R.T. Current values missing in AIDA64 v8.30.8300
Fiery replied to Viper7853's topic in Bug reports
Those columns are not relevant for any NVMe drives, not just ones driven by the Native NVMe layer of Windows. -
It actually looks very great
-
Hello, I receive the following message immediately when starting a GPU stress test with Aida64: "the instruction at 0x00000 referenced memory at 0x00000. The memory could not be written." When I perform all other test via Aida there are no problems. I also have no problems when benchmarking the GPU in other benchmarks/games. I used to be able to stress the GPU via Aida, not sure why suddenly I receive the above message. I ran Windows memory test without any problems as well. CPU: 9950X3D GPU: RX 9070 XT OS: Win 11 Memory: DDR5 2x32GB Many thanks in advance. //Matt
-
good night changed their profile photo
-
Marc Vinn changed their profile photo
-
fixed: S.M.A.R.T. Current values missing in AIDA64 v8.30.8300
FatBoyNL replied to Viper7853's topic in Bug reports
When the Native NVMe mode/feature has been enabled in Win11, the lists named "Threshold", "Value" and "Worst" are still empty on the SMART page. -
-
fixed: S.M.A.R.T. Current values missing in AIDA64 v8.30.8300
Fiery replied to Viper7853's topic in Bug reports
Please describe the issue about Native NVMe SSDs.
