Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Today
  2. Yesterday
  3. Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please use AIDA64 to test the motherboard of Supermicro X11 series and verify whether it will be stuck for a long time, it is best to be in the same system environment. Large-capacity memory test to verify lag time in order to try to optimize.
  4. Last week
  5. For clarity, there is a screenshot of my situation at the bottom. I. e. 2 monitors are connected to the computer, absolutely identical-but except for the serial number and release date, and when uploading the report to the database-I can't process this information so that I understand that in the report there are 2 monitors, if they differ in name, then it would still be possible to group them, but not in this case. And this is where it would help a lot to have an additional field Sequel by which I would be able to group, and understand that there are 2 or more pieces. Similar situations are suitable for many other types of information where there are many similar devices
  6. It is clear, but if you imagine that you probably have some lists of fields in the program somewhere, i.e. some database of them (which grows every time of course) Can it add some auto-increment to each field, so to say all the current fields are numbered , and when new ones appear, they are given the following numbers. When working with data from the database, there is no numeric field that can be used to index and filter information much faster and more convenient than relying on a text field that can be changed at any time by the language localizer that I use
  7. Not sure if this issue is me doing something wrong or if it's a problem with the software. I am using RemoteSensor to display hardware monitoring on a 7" LCD panel. I have had no problems setting it up and everything is functioning fine (been using this software for many years, right back to Everest days), and I can export my layout as an .rslcd file no problem, and I now have a few different layouts saved. In the AIDA64 Preferences > LCD > LCD Items page, there is the ability to create multiple pages to display on the LCD panel (up to 6) and cycle through them on a specified time period per page, which is awesome. The problem: As mentioned, I have a bunch of saved .rslcd files and I'd like to import each one as a different page, but it seems no matter which page tab I select, when I try to import one of my .rslcd files, it always imports the file to the first page (tab) and wipes out whatever was there already, instead of importing to the page tab I want it to be on. Because of this, aside from the first page, I have to make every additional page from scratch rather than importing a .rslcd file for it. Is there some way around this, or it's just something in the 'to be fixed' pile? Thanks.
  8. It's not possible to cherry-pick from the reference results I'm afraid. And when it comes to "similar systems", it's not easy to decide which one is similar to the current system. You could go by CPU vendor, number of cores, CPU socket, CPU clock, etc.
  9. I'd like to benchmark PC's with i5-6500, i5-7500T and i5-8500 and compare them with similar reference results. I'm getting an anoying long list from Sempron 2600+up to 20x Xeon/32x Opeteron. In Preferences I can either hide all benchmark reference results (can't compare at all) or only the best (still with very old/slow systems, no better systems to compare). How to get only reference results for similar systems?
  10. Good day! All my reports are placed in the database, but the problem is that I want to make a transposition of information, and from the item table where monitors are described for example, make a table reference for all monitors on computers. That is a unique reference table The problem is that it happens for some reason when two monitors are connected to the computer, but they differ slightly in characteristics (quite a bit, but they are still different) So I get this way I can not distinguish them as they are different monitors. I can determine their uniqueness by a set of values of certain fields, but in this case, as if the item table does not have a column with the number of the monitor instance (like ISequel), so that it was possible to group monitor instances by it
  11. Yes, you right... But for a day I suspect the operating system will collect from 2000 or more events of the Information type, and with the number of 5000 computers, I'm afraid that there will be a lot of records in the database, of which only 10% are needed
  12. Hm. And I can somehow pass my value there (RLocation or maybe even in RComment), for example through a parameter in the command line? For example, if I have a task run by policies, I would specify gpo_executor in the RComment field
  13. The current way is fine for us.
  14. RLocation was defined to help companies with multiple sites/locations manage their data. It's intentionally left empty so you can fill it up if you need that field for each report/computer.
  15. The background (automatic) report creation process is designed to not slow the computer down. In case your users have difficulties using their computers while the report is being created in the background, then I suppose those PCs must be very old and very slow anyway. Is that the case? BTW, you can use the /IDLE command-line option to change the process priority of AIDA64 to idle, which could help to improve user experience during automatic background report creation.
  16. It's not possible to assign an IID for everything that AIDA64 puts into the reports simply because then the number of IID's would be 100 times more than right now, and that would slow down the processing of reports by the Audit Manager and Change Manager modules of AIDA64. We keep adding new IID's on a case by case basis, per customer request.
  17. It's completely logical, because the target report file in that case would be a text file with the .ADO extension. In that file AIDA64 will put an error message in case the report cannot be inserted into the database. Due to e.g. SQL misconfiguration or such. If you don't want to have that output, you can specify a non-existing filename that cannot be created anyway, like C:\?
  18. It'd be best for you to put all Event Logs records into your database and then use SQL queries to filter them to your preferences.
  19. We do not have plans to enable such filtering for the Event Logs page. You seem to be a corporate user of AIDA64, so once you've collected the reports you can filter them by using any criteria you wish, using e.g. SQL queries.
  20. Is there a way we could make the procress easier for me to add the displays that are missing? And likewise easier for you to implement instead of having to type off a image?
  21. Okay thanks for the info, Please let me know once a solution is available, thanks!
  22. It would be great if there was a possibility of filtering events is also additional by Source For example, I do not want to have a list of all event type Information, and want to have the event Source - MsiInstaller type (the type Information), and the Source - Microsoft Windows security auditing (type Audit) And that this Source type selection is not a Checkbox, but just a comma-separated string, for example: MSiInstaller, Microsoft Windows security auditing, Kernel-general, ... and etc.
  23. You have a useful option to generate a report based on Windows logs where you can specify how long it takes to display results. However, it is not possible to specify the number of days in the plan, for example, only the last 10,000 entries. In my case, I want to have all records from the MsiInstaller category in the report to log who installed / deleted which application. And everything seems to be fine, I can get it, but let's say that the report was generated when the computer booted, after which the user installed the application-worked in it and deleted it - and then went on vacation for 10 days, so the next time his computer turns on and generates a report, but without this data, because they do not fit in the range of 7 days. So unfortunately I can't find out about the actions taken
  24. Good day, I noticed a feature that I can't run the report generation in the database (/DATABASE) in the command line without specifying the /R parameter That seems to be illogical, because I want to enter data in the database, why should I specify a parameter that specifies the local storage of data
  25. Good day, you have a good field in the database for storing unique identifiers of different types of report variables. This eliminates filtering by word depending on the language used (and also protects in the future, if developers suddenly want to call the parameter differently) But unfortunately, not all your data has a unique identifier, and it's not even that the less popular categories are devoid of an identifier, but even those like the processor do not have one For example screenshot attached to topic
  26. Good afternoon, please add such an indicator as the time spent on generating the report. In my local network, when loading computers ( more than 3000 computers ), automatic report generation is started with uploading to the database, and computers have different characteristics, i.e. they are very weak, or with a large number of files, windows security events, etc. In such cases, there is not enough such a metric as the time spent on generating a report, on the basis of which we could understand where the computer is slowing down and the user is suffering Ideally, I see this as an additional field in the Report table (when uploading to the database)
  27. Good day! Please tell me what the RLocation field in the database means? I have always empty, and for the sake of interest where the information is taken put The RComment field, as I understand it, is the computer description field in the computer properties.
  28. In addition, HWiNFO64 displays SPD correctly, while AIDA64 cannot display SPD.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...