Jump to content

MAA

Members
  • Posts

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by MAA

  1. Fiery

    Did I understand correctly that in the reference results you publish the base frequency, but the benchmark itself is performed at the turbo frequency?

    In my opinion this is an incorrect approach, which is misleading.

    Some processors have a very high turbo frequency (up to +200% to Base), but it works very short time:

    17.png

     

    In my opinion, you should publish the Turbo frequency, or increase the benchmarks time to several minutes.

  2. 3 hours ago, Fiery said:

    From the memory interface perspective, reading 32MB and writing 32MB is considered transferring a total of 64MB data, that's why we use the formula "Score = 64MB / time_it_took_in_seconds".

    It can be Ok if benchmark called "memory throughput" or "memory bandwidth". But your benchmark called "memory copy", and must show the speed of copying = 32MB/time.

  3. On 09.01.2017 at 5:57 PM, Fiery said:

    We do 1/a, so we read something and then write it. It's not full duplex. And the read and write block sizes are added up together, so it's not 1/2 of read/write speed, but 1/1. 

    you do math calculations incorrect.

    you do not must add up read and write block sizes, but you must add up read and write times.

  4. 1) Copying can be done in two ways:

    a) read, then write. In this case copy speed is 1/2 of r/w speed.

    b ) read and write simultaneously. In this case copy speed = r/w speed, but  memory and memory controller should operate in full-duplex.

    which method uses your copy bench?

    2) may you can provide also single-threaded memory bench for information purposes?

×
×
  • Create New...