Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum

Recommended Posts

Hello.

I recently built a new pc and my mobo has one of those debug led codes. Aparently the code i get (D4) has something to do with pci power but i read that migt be a ram issue. So i decided to get aida64 and run the benchmark. My cpu gets to 100% usage but my ram never gets past 91%, i thought i should get to 100% as well and since i get that debug code i wonder if i should return the ram for a new one since these i have might not be working correctly.

Also what are the best ways for troubleshooting ram like that?

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to put maximum stress on your memory modules, then use the Memory Read benchmark instead of the RAM subtest of the System Stability Test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By jwj850jj@gmail.com
      Hello everybody!
      First time posting to the forum, indeed it is my first time viewing the forum.  Ive been using the Engineer version of Aida64 (registered) for about 3 months now, and overall Im impressed with the software.  Its nice to just throw together a few different benchmarks and have them run how and when I want in the order I want.  I was doing all this with macros before
      Ive recently gotten back into building PCs, took a long hiatus back in the late 90s my last system having been assembled was a 440BX based chipset on an Abit motherboard, both of which no longer exist at least in a meaningful way lol.  I was an OC neophyte back then, as I am now, although I do enjoy the hobby/sport(?)
      I decided to wade into the dark and murky waters of RAM OCing, and went down that rabbit hole for a few weeks.  Long story short, I bought 2 x 16GB sticks of G.Skill 3600mhz XMP mem.  Stock timings sucked at 19-20-20-40-500 but I didnt know or care much about timings at the point I bought and assembled the system and so didnt realize their huge impact (relatively speaking) on ram performance.
      I was able to get them to post at 4000mhz 17-22-22-36-485 and ran that for a few months, then last night got the idea to try and tweak them some more, thinking maybe all these on off cycles might have trained them to do better (i dont know if that logic is incorrect or not in regards to training, but its how I justified another sweaty night of swearing out loud and smashing keys to my wife)
      Im now resting at 4000mhz 16-22-22-40-500 but I can feel they have more to give in the timings department.  Frankly, im already amazed at how well these Hynix CJR chips are doing on the OC.  My question is basically, Aida shows me as being first place in Latency, and near top tier in every memory bench, with only quad channel or server boards (mostly) beating me.  Are these results typical for these chips and my rig?  What can I do to push it further if anybody has any recommendations?  And am I correct in feeling a sense of accomplishment at being in the top spot for latency, or is my joy tragically misplaced?
      Thanks a lot guys, and to the Devs, great product and I will continue to use and support you!
      Relevant Screens attached.  






    • By c2aku
      I just bought a new RAM and installed it on my laptop and opened AIDA64 and I found out that my new installed ram(KINGSTON) is not showing under SPD in motherboard drop-down menu but it is showing my older RAM(HYNIX)  which was previously installed.
       

    • By Oldmanbythesea
      Hi there I’ve got a peculiar issue that I am unsure if it is system or program related. Am using latest stable release. When running all other tests are fine. Would appreciate any help
      But the moment I start the systems memory test it’ll rise to 100% and hang after 2-3s. No oc on ram. Running on xmp setting. Ram is g.skill trident z rgb 64gb (8x8) 3200
      system:
      6900k OC at 4.5/4.4
      cache OC at 35
      asus rampage v edition 10
      ram as above 
      evga classified 1080ti sli
      evga 1600w psu
      samsung 960 Pro 1TB
      samsung 950 Pro 512gb
       
    • By Juan
      Hello I have a toshiba A665-sp6004m laptop with the following specifications: -Operating System • Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium 64-bit • Intel® Core i7-740QM Processor or 1.73 GHz (2.93 GHz with Turbo Boost Technology), 6MB Cache • Mobile Intel® HM55 Express Chipset • NVIDIA® GeForce® GT330M with 1GB GDDR3 discrete graphics memory, plus up to 1758MB Dynamically allocated shared graphicsmemory using NVIDIA® TurboCache ™ technology. • Configured with 4GB DDR3 (max 8GB) I currently have 2 samsung modules of 2gb of 1066mhz each and I want to increase the ram memory that brings up to 8gb, I offer a crucial memory mark CT5308315 that is compatible with my lap and it is the following: http://uk.crucial.com/gbr/en/satellite-a665-sp6004m/CT5308315#productDetails Crucial Brand Form Factor SODIMM Total Capacity 8GB Kit (4GBx2) Specs DDR3 PC3-12800 • CL = 11 • Unbuffered • NON-ECC • DDR3-1600 • 1.35V • Crucial Series ECC NON-ECC Speed 1600 MT / S Tracer False Voltage 1.35V DIMM Type Unbuffered Bullet Features But I have also seen the kingston hyper x HX316LS9IB / 4 impact for the same price that I offer the crucial brand with the following specifications: http://www.kingston.com/datasheets/HX316LS9IB_4.pdf CL (IDD) 9 cycles Row Cycle Time (tRCmin) 48.125ns (min.) Refresh to Active / Refresh 260ns (min.) Command Time (tRFCmin) Row Active Time (tRASmin) 33.75ns (min.) Maximum Operating Power TBD W * @ 1.35V UL Rating 94 V - 0 Operating Temperature 0o C to 85o C Storage Temperature -55 ° C to + 100 ° C Here the detail is that I do not know if this Kingston memory is compatible with my laptop, which one would you recommend? Thank you very much
    • By MythicalMalice
      I recently built my new rig and I am running some stress tests on my system to ensure stability. Everything works fine when using Asus' ROG RealBench software but when I use AIDA64 I start running into issues. The first time I ran AIDA64 I ran the stress test with stock preferences and settings for the trial version and the CPU, FPU, Cache, Memory, and GPU boxes checked. The test ran for 4 1/2 hours before a hardware failure was detected. I then tried running the test again and this time it only lasted 20 minutes. I then unchecked the 'Stress GPU' box and tried again, and it only lasted about 20 minutes again. I am now running the test without the 'Stress Memory' box checked as well now (leaving only CPU, FPU, and Cache left checked) and it's been 2 hours with no faults yet.
       
      My guess is that it has something to do with my RAM, but I have no idea as to why or how. And if it is my RAM causing issues, is it a fatal error or will I be ok and I should just move on? Is there anything I can do to fix this? I am including some screen shots of my system specs and numbers.
       
      On the picture with the red circle around my RAM speed, just ignore that, my memory is actually running at 3000 (I am using G. Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3000 RAM) as you can see in the CPU-Z pics. On the screenshot of my BIOS settings, on the line for my DRAM Frequency, that has also been changed to Auto instead of [DDR4-3000 30x10...]
       
      Let me know if I need to provide any more info. I do not really know how to use AIDA64 so this is new to me.
       
       
       
      UPDATE: The stress test on the CPU, FPU, and Cache has been running for 11 hours now. I am now fairly certain that my hardware failure had to do with my memory during it's stress test. Will this cause a problem later on or should I just leave it alone?
       
       
       
      UPDATE 2: Sadly the stress test failed at 11 hours 28 minutes. I'm not really sure what I should try next. Screenshots of failed test is now also attached. Any tips on what I can do to make this more stable would be much appreciated.







×
×
  • Create New...