Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

With the last beta, the temperature of M2 has changed (960 EVO, eg)
It is now the temperature of the memory controller that is indicated

Drive Temperature 1: Memory temperature
Drive Temperature 2 : Memory Controller temperature


It's better to have this temperature rather than the "memory" ?

Thanks


 

Posted
2 hours ago, tistou77 said:

Hello

With the last beta, the temperature of M2 has changed (960 EVO, eg)
It is now the temperature of the memory controller that is indicated

Drive Temperature 1: Memory temperature
Drive Temperature 2 : Memory Controller temperature


It's better to have this temperature rather than the "memory" ?

Thanks

From where did you gather the info on the meaning of Drive Temperature 1 and 2?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Fiery said:

From where did you gather the info on the meaning of Drive Temperature 1 and 2?

On different forum (and HW Info forum) ;)

Posted
31 minutes ago, tistou77 said:

On different forum (and HW Info forum) ;)

Thank you. IMHO no matter what component of the SSD the thermal reading is coming from, if it's higher than the rest, that's the one that is the critical temperature reading and so it should be considered the drive temperature.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Fiery said:

Thank you. IMHO no matter what component of the SSD the thermal reading is coming from, if it's higher than the rest, that's the one that is the critical temperature reading and so it should be considered the drive temperature.

It seems that is the temperature of the controller that triggers the trottle, indeed

Posted
3 hours ago, tistou77 said:

In the changelog, I saw this

removed: NVMe SSD temperature is now the highest temperature sensor reading

Now, it's as before ?

Yes, we've rolled back that change, after getting a few feedbacks and also doing some research.  It's best to keep the primary thermal reading as the relevant temperature reading for the SSD, and have the rest as alternative readings that may or may not reflect the thermal state of the memory chips or other components of the SSD.

Posted
12 hours ago, Fiery said:

Yes, we've rolled back that change, after getting a few feedbacks and also doing some research.  It's best to keep the primary thermal reading as the relevant temperature reading for the SSD, and have the rest as alternative readings that may or may not reflect the thermal state of the memory chips or other components of the SSD.

Ok thanks for the feedback

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...