Jump to content

MAA

Members
  • Posts

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by MAA

  1. in that case both results should be published
  2. Why is SMT disabled?
  3. Why in ZLib the result of Threadripper 7975WX is almost the same as the old 3970X? Maybe need to use next gen Zlib? https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng
  4. Why new 7.35.7000 CPU CheckMate benchmark do not have Threadripper 7975WX result?
  5. >>We're already working on a new Queen benchmark that would replace the current out-dated one in the next AIDA64 stable update latest stable 7.30.6900 still has this issue
  6. Hello, Does AIDA work in Windows on ARM? (in native mode, without emulation)
  7. Hello, 1) CPU Queen Why is the result of the newest Threadripper 7975WX worse than that 3970X (and even old 2990WX)? 2) FPU Mandel Why is the result of the newest Threadripper 7975WX worse than that 3970X? it should be twice as fast, as can be seen from the result in FP64 Raytrace.
  8. I also discovered that when the temperature of everything increases, the temperature of the GMCH decreases
  9. Hello, I suspect that the GMCH temperature is displayed incorrectly... Lenovo B560 / Intel Pentium P6100 / Intel HD Graphics
  10. It would be good to have an online database of validated user results, like this: https://valid.x86.fr/bench/1
  11. Hello, Where can I see information about whether the GPU supports anti-aliasing or not? And if so, what types of antialiasing does it support?
  12. This screenshot is just an example. In any case, all information in one place will be useful. If you want users to calculate the width of the memory bus themselves, specify the width of one channel.
  13. On AMD shows correct information (Dual-channel DDR5):
  14. Hello, Please add this information to "Cache And Memory Benchmark" page: 1) number of installed memory modules 2) memory bus width in use
  15. In that case, maybe you should write to Intel and have them correct the incorrect information on their website?
  16. Hello, As we can see from the specifications on the Intel website, i9-13900K and i9-12900K processors only support dual-channel mode: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/230496/intel-core-i913900k-processor-36m-cache-up-to-5-80-ghz.html https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/134599/intel-core-i912900k-processor-30m-cache-up-to-5-20-ghz.html But Aida reports about the Quad-channel mode:
  17. Hello, AIDA measures RX7600 FLOPS values significantly lower than theoretically possible
  18. This is a speed test between iGPU cores and memory. How are the x64 CPU cores involved? And what do you mean by "bottleneck" in terms of hardware architecture?
  19. Hello, Why does the GPGPU benchmark show Memory Read/Write results so much lower than the x64 CPU? The iGPU is located on the same chip as the Memory Controller and CPU, and should show the same read/write speed.
  20. Hello, Please add info about GPGPU benchmarks to Help - AIDA64 Help - Benchmark guide
  21. Hello, Please add info about Direct2D/DirectWrite (hardware support, version, supported features)
  22. maybe just add long running versions of existing benchmarks?
  23. Hello, Please add Half-Precision FLOPS (FP16), bfloat16 (BF16), 8-bit Integer IOPS (INT8), and SHA-2 to GPGPU Benchmark
  24. Alternatively, you can replace it with CPU VideoWorxx to measure the encoding speed on codecs VVC or EVC.
  25. Hello, do you plan to add AI/ML benchmark for CPU and GPU (using Intel AMX and Nvidia Tensor Cores, also Ryzen AI and Intel VPU)?
×
×
  • Create New...