MAA

1) Single-core benchmarks are very popular in reviews this year for comparing different microarchitectures (Sky lake vs. Kaby Lake vs. Coffee Lake and Ryzen vs. xxxLake). It will increase the reference benchmark results database only twice. 2) Maybe you'll write an additional benchmark specifically for "single-core mode"?

Hello, 1) CPU benchmarks have "Parameters" and we can select single-core mode (1 CPU). But Reference Results remain multi-core. Please add single-core Reference Results also. 2) Please add single-core mode also for Memory benchmarks.

AIDA64 v5.95 still does not support AVX-512?

Hello, "FPU VP8" benchmark is very strange and do not scale on multi-core systems. May be replace it to a more common HEVC encoding?

I am disappointed. In my opinion, the benchmark should come out no later than the release of a new processor with new instructions (for this, there are engineering samples). Very bad news - all new reviews with AIDA64 show incorrect data and do not show the real potential of the processor:

OMG! But why??? CPU with AVX-512 released a year ago.

Hello, Why AIDA64 Help (F1) Benchmark guide do not updated about using extensions like SHA and AVX-512?

Why AIDA do not have Ryzen results anymore?

As i see in AIDA 64 Help: "CPU Hash This integer benchmark measures CPU performance using the SHA1 hashing algorithm" But many cryptocurrencies uses double SHA256. Also, many cryptocurrencies uses another hash algo.

Hello, Please add benchmark (Hash/sec) for some popular cryptocurrencies

>> We've also added a Broadwell-E i7-6850K result Thank you. What about i7-6900K and i7-6950X ? >> and an Apollo Lake reference I do not see Apollo Lake results.

Hello, Please add benchmark results for Intel Xeon Phi x200 series CPU (Socket LGA3647)

end user looks at the name of the test, he not interested how test perform it.

Sandra do not have benchmark with name "Memory copy". Sandra have bench with name "Memory bandwidth" with correct formula for this case.

It can be Ok if benchmark called "memory throughput" or "memory bandwidth". But your benchmark called "memory copy", and must show the speed of copying = 32MB/time.

you do math calculations incorrect. you do not must add up read and write block sizes, but you must add up read and write times.

>> There's no consensus in the benchmark industry about how to calculate the memory/cache copy scores It can not be two opinions. If you have B bytes and copying time is t sec, then copy speed = B/t bytes/sec.

1) Copying can be done in two ways: a) read, then write. In this case copy speed is 1/2 of r/w speed. b ) read and write simultaneously. In this case copy speed = r/w speed, but memory and memory controller should operate in full-duplex. which method uses your copy bench? 2) may you can provide also single-threaded memory bench for information purposes?

If memory test is synthetic sum of multiple threads, how can I see more "real life" performance of single-thread speed?

Hello, 1) As i see, Memory Copy ≈ Memory Read ≈ Memory Write speed. How it possible? Memory and memory controller can operate in full-duplex? 2) Memory bench result is speed via one thread, or sum of multiple threads?

Hello, Does AIDA64 CPU Hash benchmark use Intel SHA extensions?

You can use netsh wlan show interfaces see "Channel" info (1...13) = 2.4GHz band (34...165) = 5GHz band

changes are small. enough to update the results every quarter or once a year.

Hello, Please add some reference results for GPGPU Benchmark (like CPU/Memory bench)

Hello, I have dual-band (2.4/5GHz) WiFi USB adapter, connected to dual-band AP. How can i see current band (on client side)?