Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum
Fiery

AIDA64 compatibility with AMD Ryzen processors

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Alan said:

Just found the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X cannot run FPU VP8 benchmark, it's an unknown issue of #5 or #6?

It's an issue that only comes up when you have SMT disabled on Ryzen processors.  We will fix the issue in the next AIDA64 stable update due in a few weeks from now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2018/2/28 at 6:59 PM, Fiery said:

It's an issue that only comes up when you have SMT disabled on Ryzen processors.  We will fix the issue in the next AIDA64 stable update due in a few weeks from now.

Hi Fiery,

Fixed in v5.97.4600, thanks a lot :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alan said:

Hi Fiery,

Fixed in v5.97.4600, thanks a lot :)

Thank you for your feedback ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎-‎10‎-‎2017 at 11:54 AM, Fiery said:

We haven't got any further assistance from AMD to step further about that issue.  There may not be a technical solution afterall :(

Any news of this? Is more than a year from the launch date. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2018‎. ‎04‎. ‎10‎. at 3:25 AM, Luis said:

Any news of this? Is more than a year from the launch date. Thanks!

There's no technical solution to the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hello, I am the new ^^ Have the gigabyte x470 operated with ryzen 5 2600x The temperature of the diode in the idle seems to me very strange, under load it goes to 110 ... oO can this be?

Diode.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎6‎/‎1‎/‎2018 at 10:07 PM, AndyF said:

Hello, I am the new ^^ Have the gigabyte x470 operated with ryzen 5 2600x The temperature of the diode in the idle seems to me very strange, under load it goes to 110 ... oO can this be?

Make sure to upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme available at:

https://www.aida64.com/downloads/latesta64xebeta

After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is the right place to post this, and I don't know if this source counts as "official" enough for your criteria to be included in your database, but it looks like in this Anandtech article they state the manufacturing process as well as TDP for the AMD X470 chipset (and X370 if you don't already have that info in the database).

Quote

The big change in the chipset will be in the power consumption. Currently the X370 chipset, built on a 55nm manufacturing process using ASMedia IP, runs at a 6.8W TDP (running at full load). For X470, we were told that this is the same process and IP, but the chip will now run at 4.8W peak and 1.9W in an idle mode.

- Ian Cutress (via Anandtech)

 

169318134_X470specs4657Beta.png.9711bc649a548813ca794c670eb0f5bd.png

Just trying to do my part to improve this super useful tool!

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, MrCommunistGen said:

I don't know if this is the right place to post this, and I don't know if this source counts as "official" enough for your criteria to be included in your database, but it looks like in this Anandtech article they state the manufacturing process as well as TDP for the AMD X470 chipset (and X370 if you don't already have that info in the database).

Just trying to do my part to improve this super useful tool!

Thanks!

Thank you, we'll add those info to the next AIDA64 beta build.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By jwj850jj@gmail.com
      Hello everybody!
      First time posting to the forum, indeed it is my first time viewing the forum.  Ive been using the Engineer version of Aida64 (registered) for about 3 months now, and overall Im impressed with the software.  Its nice to just throw together a few different benchmarks and have them run how and when I want in the order I want.  I was doing all this with macros before
      Ive recently gotten back into building PCs, took a long hiatus back in the late 90s my last system having been assembled was a 440BX based chipset on an Abit motherboard, both of which no longer exist at least in a meaningful way lol.  I was an OC neophyte back then, as I am now, although I do enjoy the hobby/sport(?)
      I decided to wade into the dark and murky waters of RAM OCing, and went down that rabbit hole for a few weeks.  Long story short, I bought 2 x 16GB sticks of G.Skill 3600mhz XMP mem.  Stock timings sucked at 19-20-20-40-500 but I didnt know or care much about timings at the point I bought and assembled the system and so didnt realize their huge impact (relatively speaking) on ram performance.
      I was able to get them to post at 4000mhz 17-22-22-36-485 and ran that for a few months, then last night got the idea to try and tweak them some more, thinking maybe all these on off cycles might have trained them to do better (i dont know if that logic is incorrect or not in regards to training, but its how I justified another sweaty night of swearing out loud and smashing keys to my wife)
      Im now resting at 4000mhz 16-22-22-40-500 but I can feel they have more to give in the timings department.  Frankly, im already amazed at how well these Hynix CJR chips are doing on the OC.  My question is basically, Aida shows me as being first place in Latency, and near top tier in every memory bench, with only quad channel or server boards (mostly) beating me.  Are these results typical for these chips and my rig?  What can I do to push it further if anybody has any recommendations?  And am I correct in feeling a sense of accomplishment at being in the top spot for latency, or is my joy tragically misplaced?
      Thanks a lot guys, and to the Devs, great product and I will continue to use and support you!
      Relevant Screens attached.  






    • By NaturalBornCamper
      Hello all!
      Is it possible with Aida64 Pro to send selected (or all) benchmarking information to a channel like a txt file, a database or serial port?
      I'm asking because I would like to create my own sensor panel with a Raspberry Pi for a home project. For this, I would need to send the Aida64 data somewhere, then the Raspberry Pi could grab all the info and parse it to:
      -Log past data
      -Send on my server for remote viewing
      -insert in a database for custom statistics
      Thanks friends!
    • By Droiyan7
      Ryzen infinity fabric for ZEN and ZEN+ (Ryzen 1X00 series and 2X00 series) make memory overclock more useful but complicated.
      Sometimes, overclock fails even if both memory modules and memory controller works well but infinity fabric fails.
       
      There are claims that AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark is useful to see if that happens.

      If L3 performance significantly lower before overclock, it is fail even if every other test(Testmem5, HCI Memtest, Linpack, etc...) succeed. Because Ryzen (exclude APU) 1X00 and 2X00 series have distributed L3 cache across 2 CCX which connected by infinity fabric, infinity fabric fails affect L3 cache performance.
      So......how about allow us repeat L3 bench only (N times or time basic) ?
       
       
      Or, maybe adding options to see L3 performance results in already exist cache stress test ?

       
    • By sirlock
      Hi All, 
      Firstly I love AIDA64. It is so feature rich I can't believe I used anything else for so long! I spent 5 hours yesterday fine tuning my LCD panel display on my Android Tablet!
      I am running a Threadripper System with a ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 TR4 Motherboard. 98% of the sensors are there there, there are just a few missing. For the Fans the latest AIDA Beta shows CPU and CPU OPT and CHA Fan 2. What is missing is CHA FAN 1, H_AMP_FAN, W_PUMP+ and the 3 CHA FANS on the extension board that Plugs into the EXT_FAN header.
      As I am running a TR system that runs warm it important to be able to monitor the H_AMP_FAN and W_PUMP+ connectors as that will tell me if my Liquid Cooler is operating properly. 
      Let me know if I can provide any other info or testing to help.
      Regards,
      Lachlan.
    • By wichert
      Is the benchmarking function also made for vm's or only for physical machines?
      thanks in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...