Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good afternoon.
Please tell me what could be the problem. Memory performance degrades over time in a single session. After reboot, it repeats again.
No overclocking. BIOS parameters in AUTO + XMP.
Note that tests in, for example, 7zip and LinX do not record performance drops.
Thanks.

 

memtest1.thumb.png.332c5bbeadd37f566cd4d36b066e6e83.png

 

memtest2.thumb.png.9f68a15e1197c49df6d40a4a2b9934f6.png

 

gpgpu1.thumb.png.d9fd73ab9972f2bcb78e0939530209a5.png

 

gpgpu2.thumb.png.cb32ac40412c1f4d153b03c47736d7f5.png

Posted
1 hour ago, Ziggg said:

No, <30C surface radiator under load.

Heatsinks?

 

Does AIDA64 show temperatures of the DIMMs?

 

I also notice the CPU frequency and uncore frequency is different for the two memory benchmarks, and the CPU frequency is different for the GPGPU benchmarks.

Posted
9 hours ago, Arctucas said:

Heatsinks?

 

Does AIDA64 show temperatures of the DIMMs?

 

I also notice the CPU frequency and uncore frequency is different for the two memory benchmarks, and the CPU frequency is different for the GPGPU benchmarks.

Yes, heatsink

No, does not show. Modules without sensors. I measure with a thermocouple in Zalman Z9 Plus.

There is such a thing. It looks like AIDA64 takes their values according to its algorithm. In Hwinfo 4500 are stable for all processor cores and 4300 with uncore under load.

 

 

 
Posted

So, the processor speed is remaining constant? If BIOS setting are at DEFAULT, does that include Speedstep or various C-states being active? Perhaps Windows Power Plan is downclocking processor?

Strange that AIDA64 would show speed different from actual, but only after some time has passed.

 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, Arctucas said:

So, the processor speed is remaining constant? If BIOS setting are at DEFAULT, does that include Speedstep or various C-states being active? Perhaps Windows Power Plan is downclocking processor?

Strange that AIDA64 would show speed different from actual, but only after some time has passed.

 

 

In general, I will try to reinstall the system.  When running in Windows sandbox, the result is always normal.

Posted

Everything repeated itself.
As it turned out, reinstalling the OS was not required to fix the problems. It is enough to disable Windows Sandbox in the settings OS. 

Posted
On 12/6/2020 at 2:37 PM, Ziggg said:

Everything repeated itself.
As it turned out, reinstalling the OS was not required to fix the problems. It is enough to disable Windows Sandbox in the settings OS. 

Thank you for letting us know about the resolution.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...