Fiery

Yes, that's it.

Please upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme Edition available at: http://www.aida64.com/downloads/aida64extremebuild2025y4wsqxjd7hzip After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade. Let me know if it helps. If not, then please let us know what video card(s) do you have, and whether you have any RAID arrays defined or any external storage devices connected via USB, eSATA or FireWire. Thanks, Fiery

Yes, you need to remove all unwanted sections (AIDA64 information pages) from your RPF file to make sure you only get such details in your reports that you actually want to have there. Using /SAFE a lot of pages get disabled (and so not written into the resulting report file) due to AIDA64 not being able to utilize its low-level features. Prime examples are the Chipset page, Sensor page, SPD page, ACPI page, GPU page, etc.

Thank you. That's quite puzzling, since there doesn't seem to be any direct correlation between the 3 temperatures read from the onboard Fintek sensor chip and the values displayed by MSI Control Center. We'll need to do more research to try finding the logic behind that. Yes, it's normal, and it's due to the fact that GPGPU computations require a lot of traffic between the CPU and the GPU, so even though that's not the point, the CPU also gets stressed.

It should be available. Make sure to upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme Edition available at: http://www.aida64.com/downloads/aida64extremebuild2025y4wsqxjd7hzip After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade. Let me know how it works. Thanks, Fiery

Thank you, but which one is the North Bridge temperature there? And using which method could you identify that reading as the North Bridge temperature? I'm just asking because officially your motherboard is not able to measure that reading...

I'll move the thread under the General Discussion later today. As for the increase in detected sections, I'm not sure what you mean, since you seem to be already using the /CUSTOM command-line option that limits the detected (reported) information to your preference.

/SAFE will disable SMBus support. And you need SMBus support to detect SPD memory modules

I'm afraid we haven't been able to figure that out yet

Please note that Core 2 processors feature very inaccurate core temperature diodes The cooler the processor gets, the more inaccurate values the diodes produce. Close to +20 Celsius they can be plus/minus 20 Celsius off, and around zero Celsius they usually stop working completely. Intel only fixed that issue in Sandy Bridge. BTW, if you want, you can adjust TJMax value in AIDA64 / main menu / File / Preferences / Hardware Monitoring.

Thank you for the feedback

As Squall Leonhart suggested, you need to have the latest Intel RST Enterprise WHQL driver installed, and you need to enable the options RAID member enumeration and RAID SMART support in AIDA64 / main menu / File / Preferences / Stability. Make sure to use the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme Edition available at: http://www.aida64.co...25y4wsqxjd7hzip Let me know how it works. Thanks, Fiery

Thank you, we're already working on this issue. I'll post a message into this topic once an update is available.

It is video driver dependent. Some video drivers show one logical video adapter for every available display outputs. Some other drivers show one logical video adapter per connected outputs.

You can disable elevation if you remove (or rename) the file AIDA64.EXE.MANIFEST

That's a great catch! We're already doing test runs with Shared Memory enabled to see if we could reproduce the issue on our test systems. Meanwhile, can you please check what happens if you enable Shared Memory, but only have the CPU temperature enabled from the list of Ext.Applications items -- and no other items enabled. Second test run: have every items enabled there, disable Shared Memory, but enable Registry exporting. Those test runs may confirm whether one of the items cause a memory or handle leak, or whether the Shared Memory feature is generally at fault.

Can you please compare the temperature values against the temperature values MSI Control Center measures? Maybe the actual CPU temperature is the Aux temperature in AIDA64. 2 screen shots (one at idle, other is during or right after a Stress Test) showing AIDA64 Sensor page and MSI Control Center temperature readouts side-by-side would be a great reference Thanks, Fiery

Please let us know the full command-line you use to create the reports automatically. Thanks, Fiery

Thank you for the data. That's all normal there. You should skip the CPU temperature value, and only focus on the core temperatures.

Thank you for the feedback

We've implemented support for Outlook 97 and Outlook 2002/2003/2007/2010. Please upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme Edition available at: http://www.aida64.com/downloads/aida64extremebuild2025y4wsqxjd7hzip After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade. Let me know how it works. Thanks, Fiery

Please upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme Edition available at: http://www.aida64.com/downloads/aida64extremebuild2025y4wsqxjd7hzip After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade. Let me know if it helps. Thanks, Fiery

Please upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme Edition available at: http://www.aida64.com/downloads/aida64extremebuild2025y4wsqxjd7hzip After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade. Let me know if it helps. Thanks, Fiery

Thank you for the dump. Please copy-paste the full content of the Computer / Sensor page here as well.

Thanks for the feedback