Jump to content

tistou77

Members
  • Posts

    460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by tistou77

  1. Thanks so very much for your great work ;) I test that when I go home I will look for the order of the "probes" too PS: tested on my laptop, it seems to work but very few probes
  2. I modified the language file, it's good (I had edited my post) Ok, I thought the option "Extented Labels" was to show / hide this kind of information
  3. Hello In the latest versions, the Water IN and OUT sensors have been integrated, very good These sensors are not translated yet, I looked in the language file, and the modification works On the other hand would it be possible to put the In and Out with the option "Extented Labels" If like me, we have only one probe, the In is not obligatory Thanks
  4. Yes, I know but I'll wait until you integrate the customization (renamed) the names of the probes, etc ... in this menu and then it's easy to integrate
  5. Ok thanks for the explanation, even though I did not really understand why the Intel drive is between the 2 Samsung drives
  6. It seems to work well, thank you very much The Stress Test is the same, it's stress like the previous version or harder ?
  7. Ok thanks for the explanation, Here are the files, oddly it's the Samsung on disk 0, but for Diskpart, Device Manager, it's Intel on disk 0 atadump.txt smartdump.txt Ok, so we go back to the customization of names (rename) probes, disks, etc ... in this menu So that everyone can do as he wants
  8. If it's in alphabetical order, why is it "indicated" in that order for the Intel ? In the SMART Dump, it's the Samsung on disk 0, yet it's Intel on disk 0 (Diskpart, Windows, device manager, etc ...) Just to understand, on what Aida64 is based Thanks
  9. Hello Why is the Intel SSD "in the middle" of the 2 Samsung SSDs ? And would it be possible for Aida64 to read the "name" of the SSD from the "FriendlyName" registry key ? Like here Thanks
  10. Yes, that's why I only use Stress Test where I can choose the amount of ram to "test" With Aida64, I am forced to open programs that use ram, launched the Stress Test and after closed programs, which is not easy For that I asked you if the choice of the ram to be tested could be implanted in Aida64
  11. In fact, I noticed that if I leave Aida64 allocated all the memory (+ 98%), I have an error after a few seconds, if I leave that ~ 95% I have no error
  12. Ok thanks I can only test in AVX2 (without AVX512)
  13. It's good for the times, it runs normally (there is no lag), thanks Still 98% of the memory used, for the moment, we launch several program that consumes memory, launch the Stress Test and we close the programs, like that, all the ram is not used (~90%) and the PC remains "accessible"
  14. Ok, thanks tested with and without AVX, it works very well
  15. Okay, I'm testing this tonight or tomorrow morning Memory allocation is improved or is there an option to choose the % of memory to allocate ? Thanks for your great work
  16. Okay, I'm testing this tonight or tomorrow morning If I disable AVX512, it disables "all" AVX, is it ? Thanks for your great work
  17. Ok thanks I will wait until it has changed, I tested today and the window remained "frozen" for 5 minutes (indicated "not responding" in the title bar) I check by moving the mouse to be sure that it is not the PC that has frozen
  18. Thanks for trying to solve this "problem" I do not know how it is "coded" but why not use the same method as HCI Memtest or Ram test (or even Realbench) There is no lag with these Stress test Besides, I noticed that if I use one of these Stress tests and that System Stability Test of Aida64 is open (without launching the stress of Aida64), the window System Stability Test lag (for the refresh of temperatures, voltages, etc ...) But not windows of other Stress Test Thanks
  19. My CPU is @ 4600, AVX2 @ 4200 and the AVX512 @ 3600 And I wanted to be able to test the CPU @ 4600 (without AVX so) and the rest of the configuration But it's true that I do not care a bit about the AVX512, no application I know uses this instruction But I'm waiting for this application to be "modified" (for the memory among others) before reusing it It's really annoying that lag time until 1mn, I never know if it's a freeze of the OC or if it's the Stresstest that froze
  20. Ok, all the "tests" have been modified with the AVX512 It's not possible to test without AVX
  21. I tested with my laptop, little CPU and 8GB of ram and Windows 10 No "lapse of time" during memory allocation Maybe this Stress Test better manages small configurations
×
×
  • Create New...