Jump to content

tistou77

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    454

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Everything posted by tistou77

  1. tistou77
    Ok thanks
  2. tistou77
    It seems to work well, thank you very much The Stress Test is the same, it's stress like the previous version or harder ?
  3. tistou77
    Ok thanks for the explanation, Here are the files, oddly it's the Samsung on disk 0, but for Diskpart, Device Manager, it's Intel on disk 0 atadump.txt smartdump.txt Ok, so we go back to the customization of names (rename) probes, disks, etc ... in this menu So that everyone can do as he wants
  4. tistou77
    If it's in alphabetical order, why is it "indicated" in that order for the Intel ? In the SMART Dump, it's the Samsung on disk 0, yet it's Intel on disk 0 (Diskpart, Windows, device manager, etc ...) Just to understand, on what Aida64 is based Thanks
  5. tistou77
    Hello Why is the Intel SSD "in the middle" of the 2 Samsung SSDs ? And would it be possible for Aida64 to read the "name" of the SSD from the "FriendlyName" registry key ? Like here Thanks
  6. tistou77
    Yes, that's why I only use Stress Test where I can choose the amount of ram to "test" With Aida64, I am forced to open programs that use ram, launched the Stress Test and after closed programs, which is not easy For that I asked you if the choice of the ram to be tested could be implanted in Aida64
  7. tistou77
    No swap file (since Vista)
  8. tistou77
    In fact, I noticed that if I leave Aida64 allocated all the memory (+ 98%), I have an error after a few seconds, if I leave that ~ 95% I have no error
  9. tistou77
    Ok thanks I can only test in AVX2 (without AVX512)
  10. tistou77
    It's good for the times, it runs normally (there is no lag), thanks Still 98% of the memory used, for the moment, we launch several program that consumes memory, launch the Stress Test and we close the programs, like that, all the ram is not used (~90%) and the PC remains "accessible"
  11. tistou77
    Ok, thanks tested with and without AVX, it works very well
  12. tistou77
    Okay, I'm testing this tonight or tomorrow morning Memory allocation is improved or is there an option to choose the % of memory to allocate ? Thanks for your great work
  13. tistou77
    Okay, I'm testing this tonight or tomorrow morning If I disable AVX512, it disables "all" AVX, is it ? Thanks for your great work
  14. tistou77
    Ok thanks I will wait until it has changed, I tested today and the window remained "frozen" for 5 minutes (indicated "not responding" in the title bar) I check by moving the mouse to be sure that it is not the PC that has frozen
  15. tistou77
    Thanks for trying to solve this "problem" I do not know how it is "coded" but why not use the same method as HCI Memtest or Ram test (or even Realbench) There is no lag with these Stress test Besides, I noticed that if I use one of these Stress tests and that System Stability Test of Aida64 is open (without launching the stress of Aida64), the window System Stability Test lag (for the refresh of temperatures, voltages, etc ...) But not windows of other Stress Test Thanks
  16. tistou77
    Ok thanks
  17. tistou77
    My CPU is @ 4600, AVX2 @ 4200 and the AVX512 @ 3600 And I wanted to be able to test the CPU @ 4600 (without AVX so) and the rest of the configuration But it's true that I do not care a bit about the AVX512, no application I know uses this instruction But I'm waiting for this application to be "modified" (for the memory among others) before reusing it It's really annoying that lag time until 1mn, I never know if it's a freeze of the OC or if it's the Stresstest that froze
  18. tistou77
    Ok, all the "tests" have been modified with the AVX512 It's not possible to test without AVX
  19. tistou77
    I tested with my laptop, little CPU and 8GB of ram and Windows 10 No "lapse of time" during memory allocation Maybe this Stress Test better manages small configurations
  20. tistou77
    Hardly I press Start for stress, the PC freezes or BSOD even without the FPU test (no AVX I guess) or just the test Memory and Cache No problem with the last beta Why, OC unstable ? Apart from adding the AVX512, there are also other things ?
  21. tistou77
    Hello With the latest Aida64, I guess it's the FPU option that tests in AVX512 with Skylake-X Does it automatically test in "AVX512" ? No option to just use the AVX2 (like before) or AVX512 ? Thanks
  22. tistou77
    Ok, thanks
  23. tistou77
    If you need other tests An idea of when will be available the "new option" for memory allocation ?
  24. tistou77
    Ok it's by "alphabetical order " Thanks
  25. tistou77
    Weird, in physical drives, 960 Pro is first And in SMART, 960 EVO is first smartdump.txt
×
×
  • Create New...