Jump to content

tistou77

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    468

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Everything posted by tistou77

  1. tistou77
    On different forum (and HW Info forum) ;)
  2. tistou77
    Hello With the last beta, the temperature of M2 has changed (960 EVO, eg) It is now the temperature of the memory controller that is indicated Drive Temperature 1: Memory temperature Drive Temperature 2 : Memory Controller temperature It's better to have this temperature rather than the "memory" ? Thanks
  3. tistou77
    Ok thanks
  4. tistou77
    Hello Will it be possible to have the changelog when an update is available (hover the version with the mouse for example) If I'm not mistaken, this is the case when there is 2 proposed update Thanks
  5. tistou77
    Thanks
  6. tistou77
    Hello Possible to change Noyau du GPU by Noyau GPU for GPU Core ? As CPU Core is tranducted by Noyau CPU CPU Core=Noyau CPU GPU Core=Noyau du GPU => Noyau GPU Thanks
  7. tistou77
    1) You're welcome 2) ok For the temperatures, it's very good Maybe as for temperatures, "grouped" voltages (with the same icons) like this may be CPU Core, VID, CPU Cache, VCCIN, VCCIO, VCCSA, +3.3v, etc... , VBAT, DIMM, GPU Core 3) Ok thanks 4) Ok Thanks so much
  8. tistou77
    So I tested and it works, great I noticed some small anomalies 1) For the French translation, Water In is translated as Eau dans, while it is Eau entrée (or something like that) 2) In the voltage section, some voltages have been moved, but nothing serious, just the probes that are a little mixed (Before / After) 3) And I tested to rename the name of a section (Cooling Fans for example) It works but it's not registered, and at the next launch, it's the default name Thanks so much for your great work PS: the name change is not reported in the System Stability Test?
  9. tistou77
    Thanks so very much for your great work ;) I test that when I go home I will look for the order of the "probes" too PS: tested on my laptop, it seems to work but very few probes
  10. tistou77
    Aa OK
  11. tistou77
    I modified the language file, it's good (I had edited my post) Ok, I thought the option "Extented Labels" was to show / hide this kind of information
  12. tistou77
    Hello In the latest versions, the Water IN and OUT sensors have been integrated, very good These sensors are not translated yet, I looked in the language file, and the modification works On the other hand would it be possible to put the In and Out with the option "Extented Labels" If like me, we have only one probe, the In is not obligatory Thanks
  13. tistou77
    Yes, I know but I'll wait until you integrate the customization (renamed) the names of the probes, etc ... in this menu and then it's easy to integrate
  14. tistou77
    Ok thanks for the explanation, even though I did not really understand why the Intel drive is between the 2 Samsung drives
  15. tistou77
    Ok thanks
  16. tistou77
    It seems to work well, thank you very much The Stress Test is the same, it's stress like the previous version or harder ?
  17. tistou77
    Ok thanks for the explanation, Here are the files, oddly it's the Samsung on disk 0, but for Diskpart, Device Manager, it's Intel on disk 0 atadump.txt smartdump.txt Ok, so we go back to the customization of names (rename) probes, disks, etc ... in this menu So that everyone can do as he wants
  18. tistou77
    If it's in alphabetical order, why is it "indicated" in that order for the Intel ? In the SMART Dump, it's the Samsung on disk 0, yet it's Intel on disk 0 (Diskpart, Windows, device manager, etc ...) Just to understand, on what Aida64 is based Thanks
  19. tistou77
    Hello Why is the Intel SSD "in the middle" of the 2 Samsung SSDs ? And would it be possible for Aida64 to read the "name" of the SSD from the "FriendlyName" registry key ? Like here Thanks
  20. tistou77
    Yes, that's why I only use Stress Test where I can choose the amount of ram to "test" With Aida64, I am forced to open programs that use ram, launched the Stress Test and after closed programs, which is not easy For that I asked you if the choice of the ram to be tested could be implanted in Aida64
  21. tistou77
    No swap file (since Vista)
  22. tistou77
    In fact, I noticed that if I leave Aida64 allocated all the memory (+ 98%), I have an error after a few seconds, if I leave that ~ 95% I have no error
  23. tistou77
    Ok thanks I can only test in AVX2 (without AVX512)
  24. tistou77
    It's good for the times, it runs normally (there is no lag), thanks Still 98% of the memory used, for the moment, we launch several program that consumes memory, launch the Stress Test and we close the programs, like that, all the ram is not used (~90%) and the PC remains "accessible"
  25. tistou77
    Ok, thanks tested with and without AVX, it works very well
×
×
  • Create New...