Jump to content

tistou77

Members
  • Posts

    460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by tistou77

  1. Hello is it normal to have 2502 mhz in load for memory, instead of 5004 or 10008 ? Thanks
  2. Ok indeed it's odd that in the other sections of Aida64, the DIMMs are correctly recognized
  3. Tested and there are DIMMs that do not exist (DIMM A3, DIMM C3) Still ok in Motherboard / SPD and Computer / Overclocking
  4. Indeed, it's good in Motherboard / SPD Computer / Sensor Motherboard / SPD Just updated Computer / Sensor
  5. Hello For information, tested with SIV, HWInfo, etc... and no "bumpy phase" after start the test Only the Aida64 benchmark window (and monitoring) freeze, the other programs do not have this "bumpy phase" with the Aida64 benchmark launched
  6. It's good, the CPU Power value is indicated Aida64 indicates a really weaker value than SIV, but I do not know who is good Aida64 Idle : between 17 and 25W Load : 195W SIV Idle : 50W (do not vary) Load : ~280W 7940X at 4600mhz and 1.185v Thanks for your great work
  7. Hello is it possible to add the Power value of cores ? Just 1 line, the value of the cores is the same from what I tested with SIV If SVID is disabled in the bios, the Power value is distorted, but those of the cores are good See screen SIV and Aida64 Thanks
  8. I had tested with SIV launched at the same time as the stress test of Aida64 (more information on consumptions, etc ...) and no weird temperature/voltage with SIV
  9. But with other monitoring software I do not have this problem This is related to Aida64's stress test and its monitoring ?
  10. Hello Small bug with voltage probes in Aida64 I thought it was a problem of Asus, but all other monitoring shows good values Aida64 HWInfo In HWInfo, I do not know which 3V corresponds at +3.3v Stanby Thanks
  11. Ok for the version of Windows 10, I did not know Yes I enable EC bank switching Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...