Jump to content

tistou77

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    474

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Everything posted by tistou77

  1. tistou77
    Yes, that's why I only use Stress Test where I can choose the amount of ram to "test" With Aida64, I am forced to open programs that use ram, launched the Stress Test and after closed programs, which is not easy For that I asked you if the choice of the ram to be tested could be implanted in Aida64
  2. tistou77
    No swap file (since Vista)
  3. tistou77
    In fact, I noticed that if I leave Aida64 allocated all the memory (+ 98%), I have an error after a few seconds, if I leave that ~ 95% I have no error
  4. tistou77
    Ok thanks I can only test in AVX2 (without AVX512)
  5. tistou77
    It's good for the times, it runs normally (there is no lag), thanks Still 98% of the memory used, for the moment, we launch several program that consumes memory, launch the Stress Test and we close the programs, like that, all the ram is not used (~90%) and the PC remains "accessible"
  6. tistou77
    Ok, thanks tested with and without AVX, it works very well
  7. tistou77
    Okay, I'm testing this tonight or tomorrow morning Memory allocation is improved or is there an option to choose the % of memory to allocate ? Thanks for your great work
  8. tistou77
    Okay, I'm testing this tonight or tomorrow morning If I disable AVX512, it disables "all" AVX, is it ? Thanks for your great work
  9. tistou77
    Ok thanks I will wait until it has changed, I tested today and the window remained "frozen" for 5 minutes (indicated "not responding" in the title bar) I check by moving the mouse to be sure that it is not the PC that has frozen
  10. tistou77
    Thanks for trying to solve this "problem" I do not know how it is "coded" but why not use the same method as HCI Memtest or Ram test (or even Realbench) There is no lag with these Stress test Besides, I noticed that if I use one of these Stress tests and that System Stability Test of Aida64 is open (without launching the stress of Aida64), the window System Stability Test lag (for the refresh of temperatures, voltages, etc ...) But not windows of other Stress Test Thanks
  11. tistou77
    Ok thanks
  12. tistou77
    My CPU is @ 4600, AVX2 @ 4200 and the AVX512 @ 3600 And I wanted to be able to test the CPU @ 4600 (without AVX so) and the rest of the configuration But it's true that I do not care a bit about the AVX512, no application I know uses this instruction But I'm waiting for this application to be "modified" (for the memory among others) before reusing it It's really annoying that lag time until 1mn, I never know if it's a freeze of the OC or if it's the Stresstest that froze
  13. tistou77
    Ok, all the "tests" have been modified with the AVX512 It's not possible to test without AVX
  14. tistou77
    I tested with my laptop, little CPU and 8GB of ram and Windows 10 No "lapse of time" during memory allocation Maybe this Stress Test better manages small configurations
  15. tistou77
    Hardly I press Start for stress, the PC freezes or BSOD even without the FPU test (no AVX I guess) or just the test Memory and Cache No problem with the last beta Why, OC unstable ? Apart from adding the AVX512, there are also other things ?
  16. tistou77
    Hello With the latest Aida64, I guess it's the FPU option that tests in AVX512 with Skylake-X Does it automatically test in "AVX512" ? No option to just use the AVX2 (like before) or AVX512 ? Thanks
  17. tistou77
    Ok, thanks
  18. tistou77
    If you need other tests An idea of when will be available the "new option" for memory allocation ?
  19. tistou77
    Ok it's by "alphabetical order " Thanks
  20. tistou77
    Weird, in physical drives, 960 Pro is first And in SMART, 960 EVO is first smartdump.txt
  21. tistou77
    It may be "read" from the device manager I noticed that it was reversed too In the SMART Dump, it's the EVO on disk 0 and the Pro on disk 1 While with Diskpart, it's the Pro on disk 0 Really weird Windows10 Thanks
  22. tistou77
    Hello I have 2 Samsung NVMe SSDs (960 Pro and EVO) I noticed that it is the disc 1 (EVO) which is the 1st displayed in the list, and the disc 0 (Pro) in 2nd I have to reverse the disks and I have that Disk 0 : 960 Pro / Disk 1 : 960 EVO Disk 0 : 960 EVO / Disk 1 : 960 Pro It's not important, but it will be possible to have the disc 0 first, in the list Thanks
  23. tistou77
    I looked, in the bios I have 70 L/M and ~ 2900, 2920 RPM under Aida64 70 L/M = 70 * 1000/24 = 2916 It corresponds, no ? Asus's method will be the right one ?
  24. tistou77
    Seems to be good with 1201 bios 1.05v in bios, 1.05v with Probe It, And between 1.034v (idle) and 1.044v (load) with Aida64
  25. tistou77
    Ok thanks, I'll test the bios 1201 1102 for now
×
×
  • Create New...