Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi !

I have one question and one bug (kind of) to report, regarding hard disk monitoring and displaying on OSD or LCD.

1.) Why are disk numbers different in Windows Disk management and Aida64 ?

Disk 0 in disk management  =  Disk  1  in Aida64 
Disk 1 in disk management  =  Disk  2  in Aida64  
Disk 2 in disk management  =  Disk  3  in Aida64  
Disk 3 in disk management  =  Disk  4  in Aida64
Disk 4 in disk management  =  Disk  5  in Aida64

and so on...

 

2.) I have created a disk activity monitor on my LCD (i have 6 HDD's and a bar graph for each of them to show read and write activity and temperature. This way i know what is going on in my system)

The bug i have noticed, occurs sometimes (about 20-30% of the time) after cold boot. Sometimes my disk graphs (and temperatures) do not correspond to the names (C,D,E,F, etc.) they should. For example i scan Disk C with antivirus, but on the LCD -  bar graph over disk F shows activity. And other disks infos are messed up too.

Only thing that is helping, is restarting the computer. After that everything is correct again.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Power users and software developers are fond of zero-based indexing, but for the majority of users a one-based indexing is easier to follow.

2) I guess the explanation behind that anomaly must be that for some reason after system restart (or cold boot) your Windows installation messes up the physical drive indexes.  So e.g. disk#0 may become disk#4 and vice versa, but it is restored back after the next reboot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) Ok, but this makes it a bit uncomfortable to create such monitoring displays like i did. (i guess i am a "power user")

2.) That's what i thought but under Windows Disk Management everything seems to be ok while this anomaly occurs. (I have all the disks interlinked and messing up physical drive indexes should mess up these links but they remain working)

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, ANUBIS said:

1.) Ok, but this makes it a bit uncomfortable to create such monitoring displays like i did. (i guess i am a "power user")

2.) That's what i thought but under Windows Disk Management everything seems to be ok while this anomaly occurs. (I have all the disks interlinked and messing up physical drive indexes should mess up these links but they remain working)

1) If you're a power user, then I suppose shifting the indexes by one shouldn't be a problem ;)

2) Please make a screen shot (or report, or copy-paste) of the Storage / Physical Drives page of AIDA64 at both states (when it's OK; and when the anomaly occurs).

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) No, not a problem. Just uncomfortable. ;)  Because there are not only numbers - for some things there are numbers, for some things there are drive letters and for some things there are drive serial numbers. I need to check every time i change or create something regarding HDD's that correct number corresponds to correct drive letter and correct serial number and correct number in Disk Management.

It is a bit mess. For now i have created a table for myself - for example:  C = Disk 5 = Disk 6 in Aida64 = NVMe Force MP500      (and i have 6 Drives)

I was hoping that this can be made easier somehow.

 

2.) I will try to do so as soon as it occurs and i notice it. (i "hope" it occurs soon :D)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Ok, now - sorry for the delay, i have been very busy with travelling and work lately.

I noticed the bug again and this time i made the sreenshots as promised. I made one image with both screenshots - ok and not ok. I also added Logical Drives on both.

As you can see - logical drives and serial numbers are reported correctly on both occasions but physical drives are different and some of them are not corresponding to their logical drives.

drives.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, ANUBIS said:

Ok, now - sorry for the delay, i have been very busy with travelling and work lately.

I noticed the bug again and this time i made the sreenshots as promised. I made one image with both screenshots - ok and not ok. I also added Logical Drives on both.

As you can see - logical drives and serial numbers are reported correctly on both occasions but physical drives are different and some of them are not corresponding to their logical drives.

 

Maybe the issue is due to the two 2TB Toshiba drives are reveresed in the "NOT OK" case?  Without the drive serial number it's hard to tell which one is which.  However, since the issue affects the disk activity sensor items as well, it would be logical if it was simply an ordering issue of physical drives -- as opposed to an issue of logical drives association with physical drives.

I'm not sure however how and why those two 2TB drives change places in the order of physical drives.  Other than hot-plugging causing Windows to rescan and possibly reorder physical drives, I don't have any other tips :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify - i am talking about computer internal drives.

Sometimes these are other disks that are mixed up, sometimes more than two. I never hot plug or change any internal hard drive once i have installed OS.

Since this thing occurs only sometimes, i can not replicate this behaviour at will. I do not know what causes it.

It has been bugging me a long time - with different windows install sources, motherboards, different disks and configurations.  Thing that is certain - multiple hard drives get mixed up sometimes in Aida64.  (I use Windows 7, but i have not noticed any odd behaviour with my drives from Windows 7 side, everything works ok)

I do not understand why logical drives remain correct while physical drives change (when i plug and unplug different external drives, they change drive letters , but that is expected behaviour.) When this bug occurs, all my internal drive letters (logical drives) remain the same, as you can see on the picture, meaning that physical drives do not change really - they only appear changed. This should not be possible.

 

I added my drives with serial numbers - maybe it can help somehow ? (These are all internal drives)

C   =   Disk 5 =  Disk  6  in Aida64        NVMe  Force  MP500 (Corsair 120GB M.2)
X   =   Disk 2 =  Disk  3  in Aida64        TOSHIBA  DT01ACA200  (Y3RU3GDKS)
Y   =   Disk 1 =  Disk  2  in Aida64        TOSHIBA  DT01ACA300 (Z64MSH3AS)
Z   =   Disk 0 =  Disk  1  in Aida64        TOSHIBA  DT01ACA200  (34KN497GS)
W  =   Disk 3 =  Disk  4  in Aida64        TOSHIBA  DT01ACA300 (Z64MUY4AS)
V   =   Disk 4 =  Disk  5  in Aida64        KINGSTON  SVP200S37A120G (50026B733103712C)
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎08‎. ‎31‎. at 6:24 PM, ANUBIS said:

Just to clarify - i am talking about computer internal drives.

Sometimes these are other disks that are mixed up, sometimes more than two. I never hot plug or change any internal hard drive once i have installed OS.

Since this thing occurs only sometimes, i can not replicate this behaviour at will. I do not know what causes it.

It has been bugging me a long time - with different windows install sources, motherboards, different disks and configurations.  Thing that is certain - multiple hard drives get mixed up sometimes in Aida64.  (I use Windows 7, but i have not noticed any odd behaviour with my drives from Windows 7 side, everything works ok)

I do not understand why logical drives remain correct while physical drives change (when i plug and unplug different external drives, they change drive letters , but that is expected behaviour.) When this bug occurs, all my internal drive letters (logical drives) remain the same, as you can see on the picture, meaning that physical drives do not change really - they only appear changed. This should not be possible.

Well, it all comes down to how Windows manages physical and logical drives internally. And drive re-scanning and potentially re-ordering as well can occur by a number of reasons, not just when you connect an external drive.  It's very difficult to diagnose this issue, unless you are able to find out what triggers it to go wrong.  Maybe when you connect an USB device, like a printer or headphones?  Maybe occasionally you connect/disconnect a different kind of external drive, like a flash drive that you don't expect to be monitored?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fiery said:

Well, it all comes down to how Windows manages physical and logical drives internally. And drive re-scanning and potentially re-ordering as well can occur by a number of reasons, not just when you connect an external drive.  It's very difficult to diagnose this issue, unless you are able to find out what triggers it to go wrong.  Maybe when you connect an USB device, like a printer or headphones?  Maybe occasionally you connect/disconnect a different kind of external drive, like a flash drive that you don't expect to be monitored?

I do not know what triggers this bug, i only know how to correct it. (with restart) ;)

One thing is certain - it only occurs (sometimes) when computer starts. Never when I am logged into Windows. If i log in and drives are correct - they stay correct, no matter what i connect or disconnect into USB. My monitoring arrangement in Aida64 is built so that two extra drives are also monitored, in case i connect any eternal disks. These external drives have no fixed drive letters, just activity bars (with used space), that appear if any drive is connected. These bars can have different letters and they appear in the order i connect external drives. (this is expected behaviour and not related to this bug that occurs with internal disks.) The bug occurs even when i have not connected/disconnected anything into USB for a long time. (sometimes weeks) So i guess it is not USB related, but almost certainly SATA related. And one more thing in common - every system i have had, has been built on Asus motherboard. (for example: Asus Sabertooth Z77, TUF Z270 MARK 1)

I have tried to identify and repair this issue a long time... and i have just one certain solution to ensure that this bug will not happen - use only one disk. :D  But since it occurs only sometimes, i can live with it. I would call it a minor annoyance.

You have said on some topic (over a year ago) that Asus motherboards may have some kind of issues, because Asus is not sharing necessary information about their boards. Can it be the reason ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AIDA64 monitoring presents a mix of Logical and Physical data from activities and sensors. If there where an option to choose between sources, then one could just select to monitor the logical drives (just like Windows present them). If a physical drive ends up in several logical drives, the temperature would just be the same for a couple of logical drives...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Waxinator said:

AIDA64 monitoring presents a mix of Logical and Physical data from activities and sensors. If there where an option to choose between sources, then one could just select to monitor the logical drives (just like Windows present them). If a physical drive ends up in several logical drives, the temperature would just be the same for a couple of logical drives...

 

Yeah, but all my physical drives contain one logical drive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎09‎. ‎06‎. at 8:16 PM, ANUBIS said:

You have said on some topic (over a year ago) that Asus motherboards may have some kind of issues, because Asus is not sharing necessary information about their boards. Can it be the reason ?

No, it's more like some deep secret or issue in the "bowels" of Windows.  It's definitely software related, but quite frankly, I have no idea what could cause it :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Fiery said:

No, it's more like some deep secret or issue in the "bowels" of Windows.  It's definitely software related, but quite frankly, I have no idea what could cause it :(

Hmm,  is there any more information I could provide, that would help to identify the reason of the bug ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎09‎. ‎08‎. at 7:10 PM, ANUBIS said:

Hmm,  is there any more information I could provide, that would help to identify the reason of the bug ?

I'm afraid I've run out of ideas on what to check :(:( 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎.‎09‎.‎2017 at 6:58 PM, Fiery said:

I'm afraid I've run out of ideas on what to check :(:( 

I know a "solution", but i guess you would not implement this: if Aida would scan only logical drives instead of physical, then this kind of bug could not be possible.

(maybe give a choice - scan physical or logical drives activity, read/write and temperature = two sections: one has physical drives, other has logical drives - and same info could be read from both of these.)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎09‎. ‎14‎. at 4:51 PM, ANUBIS said:

I know a "solution", but i guess you would not implement this: if Aida would scan only logical drives instead of physical, then this kind of bug could not be possible.

(maybe give a choice - scan physical or logical drives activity, read/write and temperature = two sections: one has physical drives, other has logical drives - and same info could be read from both of these.)

The problem with that is the same old issue about Windows: some system parameters/status can be detected for only logical drives, like free drive space.  While some other parameters can only be detected for physical drives, like disk activity, disk temperature, SMART attributes, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎18‎.‎09‎.‎2017 at 12:30 PM, Fiery said:

The problem with that is the same old issue about Windows: some system parameters/status can be detected for only logical drives, like free drive space.  While some other parameters can only be detected for physical drives, like disk activity, disk temperature, SMART attributes, etc.

Ok, thanks.

 :mellow:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Similar Content

    • By Rich83
      hi all, newbie here! this is my first post so i hope it has landed in the correct place..  be gentle!

      i have installed the 'simple' version of a64, is it possible to run multiple instances of the sensor panel? i have the sensor panel running in a 5 inch screen located inside my case but have a room change planned which will put the case high on a shelf out of my eye sight so i would like a second display for stats placed under my main monitor. i plan to use a larger screen say a 10.1 'ultrawide (if thats the correct term) as i like the extra real-estate. what are my options?
      on a similar topic, is it possible to create an 'unpublished' senor panel before removing the currently used panel? or would i have to save the current panel to file or something then start a new panel?
      also can anyone point me to gauge resources, ie pre made gauges? or an easy to understand tutorial for how to diy them? total novice here, but can follow an idiots guide!

      i have included the final evolution of my first attempt using the provided gauges etc, it took me ages to get rid of the green dials.. i finally gave up trying to figure it out in a64 so i just changed the hue on the 5inch monitor lol. really hoping to learn the skills to create something like i have seen on here.. some really nice work on the share your panel thread, some of those must have taken ages!!! impressive. 
      any advice greatly received, but remember your talking to an a64 absolute novice!!
      Thanks folks. 




    • By -Vulture-
      Hey guys!
      Im hoping for some input regarding my question. I saw, AIDA64 is supporting a lot of different displays and interfaces. Now which one to choose? Heres some more input from me about what im looking for:
      [Mandatory] 5-8 inch LCD display [Mandatory] only USB powered [Mandatory] black frame design to match my case, if possible [Optional] A flat, not too thick one [Optional] small bezels if possible [Optional] No buttons neccessary, i want to place it inside of my case. [Optional] an internal USB connector to directly connect it to the motherboard At the moment im using some Aquacomputer Vision OLEDs which are working fine. But i can already see some burn in and they are pretty small. Since theres no LCD coming from Aquacomputer anytime soon, im thinking about using AIDA64 to get my data on screen. I have 3 of those OLED on each of the drive bay covers, this is more or less the space i have available
      I have attached a screenshot of the system with the OLEDs and their current placement for you to visualize.
       
      Thank you for your suggestions!


    • By tuning76
      Sziasztok!
      Nem tudom mi lehet az oka,de az AIDA64 nem tudja kiolvasni a ventillátor sebességét, de más diag és figyelő szoftver sem. Csak a BIOS-ban látható.
      Mi lehet az oka ? 
       
      A válaszokat előre is köszönöm!
      http://kepkezelo.com/images/szf2i7mmejfyyo2008t0.png
    • By Koithim
      Hey there,
      Installed the new card but i do not see all the sensors, like i did on my 2080 ti.
      Also, when the GPU is idle (low clock) the GPU Clock field on my sensor panel and LCD appear and disappear sometime. Also,
      app takes way longer to load.
      If any logs are needed just let me know.
      Cheers!
      K
       
    • By Renrut23
      Hey, new to Aida64 so be gentle,
      I have 2 Raspberry Pi 7" touchscreen display. One has a pi connected to it and the other is just the panel. The panel has just a usb port and a micro usb port. What's the easiest way to get this up and running as an external monitor? I've been running ModBros but I'm looking for something more customizable. 
       
      Also, other then the one forum post, is there anywhere to get templets to get a start from and build off of that?
×
×
  • Create New...