Jump to content

Flow sensor "calibration"


Sailing_Nut

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the info, but I was more asking where in Adia64 I can enter the information. All I see is the ability to create a "correction" in the settings with a ratio and or offset. To even begin to see if I can calculate a proper offset I would need to know the current curve that Adia64 is using. Also, if the flow sensor isn't linear or a different linearity than what is used in Adia64 it won't work with one simple offset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sailing_Nut said:

Thanks for the info, but I was more asking where in Adia64 I can enter the information. All I see is the ability to create a "correction" in the settings with a ratio and or offset. To even begin to see if I can calculate a proper offset I would need to know the current curve that Adia64 is using. Also, if the flow sensor isn't linear or a different linearity than what is used in Adia64 it won't work with one simple offset.

AIDA64 doesn't use any curve.  When it shows a RPM reading, the direct (raw) RPM value comes from the sensor that provides the reading for it.  You can use the AIDA64 Correction facility to apply a ratio and/or an offset to any given reading, but you cannot convert a reading to go from one measurement unit to the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say you have 1100 rpm when you connect the flow sensor to a fan header.

 

That would be ~255 L/H.

 

In AIDA64 you would determine which fan header was reading the flow sensor, Preferences>Correction>New Fan (X), To convert RPM to L/H, (255÷1100 = 0.231....)

Enter .231 in the ratio field, and you should see 255 value reported by that sensor in Sensor Panel. Then rename the Fan to Flow or whatever.

 

1782522052_esflowsensor.thumb.jpg.99984f18627d97a62097093768f45f8e.jpg

 

aida sensor ratio.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Arctucas Thanks for the information! I'm a bit confused because I already see the RPM and Flow in Aida64 without me doing anything. In thinking about it, my mobo must be reporting  these somehow that Aida64 is picking it up. So, I really need to get the values reported from my mobo correct. The odd thing is that the value I see in Aida64 is 51 L/H but the Asus tool is reporting 8 L/M (480 L/H)

 

 

image.png.6960d1f1400a548c814b0d6481f0f414.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sailing_Nut said:

@Arctucas Thanks for the information! I'm a bit confused because I already see the RPM and Flow in Aida64 without me doing anything. In thinking about it, my mobo must be reporting  these somehow that Aida64 is picking it up. So, I really need to get the values reported from my mobo correct. The odd thing is that the value I see in Aida64 is 51 L/H but the Asus tool is reporting 8 L/M (480 L/H)

 

 

image.png.6960d1f1400a548c814b0d6481f0f414.png

 

According to the chart provided by Alpha, @857 RPM the flow would be ~209 L/H.

 

I have no clue as to the Flow Sensor reading, perhaps Asus could answer what is happening there? Frankly, I never had faith in any Asus software, but that is just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...

A friend says that ratio 0.18, offset 10 fits well

Correction to this -

Alphacool look to have changed this, these are the corrected figures -

Ratio = 0.1709018653

Offset = 63.94619272

Which produces the following results - not perfect, but usable I feel

'rounded' is the result that would be shown.

RPM L PER HR rounded
     
35 75 70
80 80 78
100 85 81
127 90 86
156 95 91
188 100 96
215 105 101
255 110 108
290 115 114
320 120 119
350 125 124
380 130 129
420 135 136
485 140 147
515 145 152
560 150 160
580 155 163
605 160 167
630 165 172
660 170 177
675 175 179
695 180 183
720 185 187
745 190 191
775 195 196
810 200 202
840 205 208
860 210 211
885 215 215
915 220 220
940 225 225
955 230 227
975 235 231
1005 240 236
1035 245 241
1075 250 248
1100 255 252
1130 260 257
1160 265 262
1190 270 267
1220 275 272
1260 280 279
1290 285 284
1320 290 290
1350 295 295
1380 300 300
1410 305 305
1440 310 310
Edited by ldwilliams.uk
Alphacool have revised the product, resulting in new formula
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...