Jump to content
AIDA64 Discussion Forum
tistou77

Vcore with 7940X and Asus Rampage VI Apex

Recommended Posts

Hello

It seems that Aida64 reads the VCCIN (CPU VRM) and not the Vcore for the 7940X (maybe with 7920X, etc...)
It is missing the voltages for the "CPU VRM" and "Cache CPU"

 

Capture.thumb.PNG.335a50acac0ccb4dd05cdd0a4d7cd3e2.PNG 

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please right-click on the bottom status bar of AIDA64 main window --> Sensor Debug --> ISA Sensor Dump. Copy-paste the full results into this topic, or attach the results as a TXT file to your post. You may need to enable status bar in AIDA64 / main menu / View first.


Thanks,
Fiery

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, tistou77 said:

Hi Fiery

the requested file

Thanks

isasensordump.txt

Thank you.  Please upgrade to the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme available at:

https://www.aida64.com/downloads/latesta64xebeta

After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade.

Let me know how it works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎10‎. ‎12‎. at 2:58 AM, tistou77 said:

Then the Vcore is indicated but remains "blocked" in idle (no variation in load)
The CPU VRM and CPU Cache voltages are not indicated

The way it works on your motherboard is that at idle the Vcore voltage provided by the onboard sensor chip gets too low.  In which case we've been told to use the CPU VID value instead of the measured Vcore voltage value.

As far as I can tell, the voltage rails you miss aren't monitored by the onboard sensor chip on your motherboard.  You may be able to adjust those rails in the BIOS Setup, but readback is not provided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fiery said:

The way it works on your motherboard is that at idle the Vcore voltage provided by the onboard sensor chip gets too low.  In which case we've been told to use the CPU VID value instead of the measured Vcore voltage value.

As far as I can tell, the voltage rails you miss aren't monitored by the onboard sensor chip on your motherboard.  You may be able to adjust those rails in the BIOS Setup, but readback is not provided.

Ok thank you, and you know if on the Rampage VI Extreme, it's the same ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, tistou77 said:

Ok thank you, and you know if on the Rampage VI Extreme, it's the same ?

AFAIK it's the same there too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Thanks

Something I do not understand, with the Turbo Vcore software from Asus, it's possible to have the voltage of the Mesh/Cache (and modify it), Aida64 should be able to read this voltage, right?

And with the old beta, CPUID read the VCCIN
instead of Vcore, is that this tension was accessible ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

With SIV 64X, the voltages of the Mesh (VCache) and the VCCIN are well indicated
Just the VCCIN (CPU VRM)
 which is indicated as "Vcore", a bug to regulated the side of SIV

Capture.PNG.18fb8fc980fac086f7bc649fad984a9e.PNG

 

Thanks

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can tell you about the Vcore issue is that AIDA64 does what the BIOS does on your motherboard.  If the logic behind it seems odd, well, then the BIOS works odd too :)

We've added the requested CPU Cache voltage reading in the latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme available at:

https://www.aida64.com/downloads/latesta64xebeta

After upgrading to this new version, make sure to restart Windows to finalize the upgrade.

Let me know how it works ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok for Vcore, no worries

It seems to be good for Cache voltage
And for the voltage "CPU VRM", it should be possible to have it?
CPUID Aida64 reads it (but it is indicated Core Voltage and not CPU VRM)

Or it is a misreading of the Vcore (even if the voltage corresponds to the VRM CPU) ?

Thanks so much

PS: It also lacks + 3.3v voltage, normal ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎10‎. ‎20‎. at 9:16 AM, tistou77 said:

Ok for Vcore, no worries

It seems to be good for Cache voltage
And for the voltage "CPU VRM", it should be possible to have it?
CPUID Aida64 reads it (but it is indicated Core Voltage and not CPU VRM)

Or it is a misreading of the Vcore (even if the voltage corresponds to the VRM CPU) ?

Thanks so much

PS: It also lacks + 3.3v voltage, normal ?

AIDA64 CPUID Panel shows Vcore, matching the "CPU Core" voltage reading on the Computer / Sensor page.  There's no separate CPU VRM voltage rail that one could measure on your motherboard AFAIK.  We'll add +3.3V readout in the next AIDA64 beta update due in a few days from now ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Fiery said:

AIDA64 CPUID Panel shows Vcore, matching the "CPU Core" voltage reading on the Computer / Sensor page.  There's no separate CPU VRM voltage rail that one could measure on your motherboard AFAIK.  We'll add +3.3V readout in the next AIDA64 beta update due in a few days from now ;)

Thanks for the +3.3v

For the CPU VRM (VCCIN), this voltage is very well read by SIV 64X (indicated in yellow on the screen)
There will be an update of SIV to indicate the VCCIN (instead of Core)

Capture.PNG.8ae936c40425da3bc6cf5d74625ce9e4.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's why SIV will do an update normally, and indicated this voltage as VCCIN and indicated the "good" tension for the Vcore
Several people with Rampage VI have tried by changing this voltage in the bios, and this is the VCCIN

Or this tension is available or we do not understand :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, tistou77 said:

that's why SIV will do an update normally, and indicated this voltage as VCCIN and indicated the "good" tension for the Vcore
Several people with Rampage VI have tried by changing this voltage in the bios, and this is the VCCIN

Or this tension is available or we do not understand :)

All I know is that VIN0 is Vcore :) But at idle its value shouldn't be used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎27‎/‎10‎/‎2017 at 8:29 AM, Fiery said:

All I know is that VIN0 is Vcore :) But at idle its value shouldn't be used.

ok thanks, I will use SIV64X to be able to read the VCCIN, in idle and load, the voltage is correctly read (checked with the DMM on the motherboard)

I also asked Asus to see if the problem could be corrected
For other brands of motherboard, is it the same or not ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎11‎. ‎01‎. at 2:18 AM, tistou77 said:

ok thanks, I will use SIV64X to be able to read the VCCIN, in idle and load, the voltage is correctly read (checked with the DMM on the motherboard)

I also asked Asus to see if the problem could be corrected
For other brands of motherboard, is it the same or not ?

We've done more research on this.  As it turns out, on Asus Rampage VI Apex and Extreme boards VIN0 holds VCCIN when you have a Skylake-X processor installed; but the same register holds the Vcore when you have a Kaby Lake-X processor installed.  Similar separation of register layout, based on the type of installed processor exists with other manufacturers as well.  It's a recent phenomenon about the X299 platform, and should be no longer an issue once Intel commits to a single CPU architecture for each platform :)

We'll correct the VCCIN vs. Vcore issue in the next AIDA64 beta update.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Fiery said:

We've done more research on this.  As it turns out, on Asus Rampage VI Apex and Extreme boards VIN0 holds VCCIN when you have a Skylake-X processor installed; but the same register holds the Vcore when you have a Kaby Lake-X processor installed.  Similar separation of register layout, based on the type of installed processor exists with other manufacturers as well.  It's a recent phenomenon about the X299 platform, and should be no longer an issue once Intel commits to a single CPU architecture for each platform :)

We'll correct the VCCIN vs. Vcore issue in the next AIDA64 beta update.

Ok, thanks for the explanation
Will it be possible to read the VCCIN with a Skylake-X and the next update on a Rampage VI ?

Thanks so much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, tistou77 said:

Ok, thanks for the explanation
Will it be possible to read the VCCIN with a Skylake-X and the next update on a Rampage VI ?

Thanks so much

Yes, of course. On Rampage VI boards with a Skylake-X processor installed, VCCIN will be measured, and Vcore will show the same reading as CPU VID.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

With X299, the CPU Input Voltage is indicated VCCIN, and on X99, it is indicated CPU VRM
It is possible that also was indicated CPU VRM on X299 ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎. ‎12‎. ‎03‎. at 5:06 PM, tistou77 said:

Hello

With X299, the CPU Input Voltage is indicated VCCIN, and on X99, it is indicated CPU VRM
It is possible that also was indicated CPU VRM on X299 ?

Intel uses VCCIN for the Skylake-X voltage rail in question, so that's the correct term to use by monitoring software as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By Ojustaboo
      Hi
      A few odd things. I've recently added cheap water cooling to my PC.
      It might be a misunderstanding  (or reconfiguration) on my pat. 
      1) Sometimes when I start the PC and AIDA64  auto starts, it only shows the 3 white fan options as shown in the bottom of pic "Turn on PC".
      If I close AIDA64 and restart it, or reboot, it comes up with the 5 fans it should have (see bottom of pic "Restarted"), 
      2) very occasionally it starts correctly by showing the 5 fan options, but will say both the GPU Rad fan and the Temp Side Fan are 0 RPM even though they are spinning (sorry haven't got a pic for this)
      Note, Power supply fan should be 0 RPM as it's a quite PS that only starts the fan if needed
      3) With my CPU watercooler, I installed Corsairs iCUE fan control software (I presume this is needed to control the fans?).  That software shows completely different CPU temps to yours. When running your Stress Test, (all in C)
      After 40 seconds, yours says 39 , iCUE says 33.7
      After 2 mins, yours says 40  iCUE says 34.3
      After 3 mins yours says 40  iCUE says 34.8
      After 4 mins yours says 41, iCUE says 35.1
      After 6 mins yours says 41, iQUE says 35.6
      After 11 mins yours says 42 iQUE says 36.1
      Pics of the above attached.  I left it running for a while longer, but the temp stayed fluctuating  between  41/42.
      Then after I'd stopped your stress test for a couple of mins or so your s/w says 29, iQUE says 34.6
       
      Turned on PC

       
       
      Restarted PC

       
       
      AIDA64 CPU Stress test after 40 secs

       
       
       
      AIDA64 CPU Stress test after 2 mins

       
       
       
      AIDA64 CPU Stress test after 3 mins

       
       
       
      AIDA64 CPU Stress test after 4 mins

       
       
       
      AIDA64 CPU Stress test after 6 mins

       
       
       
       
      AIDA64 CPU Stress test after 11 mins

       
       
       
      Stress test stopped for a couple of mins or so

       
       
      System Spec:
      Asus Vulcan Pro ROG Headset
      Corsair Neutron GTX SSD 240GB (C drive, System)
      Samsung 500GB EVO SSD  (D drive, Games)
      SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB (E drive, Steam Library) 
      Samsung 500GB EVO SSD  (F drive , Music S/W)
      Samsung 500GB EVO SSD  (G, H, I drive,  Docs, More Programs, Email)
      Toshiba HDwe140 4TB  (External enclosure, only plugged in to do backups) 

      XFX RADEON RX480 Black Edition OC
      Utech MMO Gaming Mouse 
      Logitech G510 Keyboard
      Razer Orbweaver Chrome
      Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 Audio interface
      Dell U2713HM monitor running at 2560 x 1440
      BenQ GW2470 runing at 1920 x 1080
      Intel Core i7 3820 a2011  3600 MHz
      Asus P9X79 Socket 2011 ATX Motherboard
      32GB Corsair Vengance DDR3 RAM
      Win 10 Pro

      Corsair 750 Watt HX750i Fully Modular ATX PSU/Power Supply
      Corsair Hydro H55 on GPU
      Corsair Hydro H100 v2 on CPU
      NTZX H440 Mid ATX PC case
       
    • By Deckard
      Hello,
      I've moved this to a separate thread.
      Ive rolled back to 4900 and the sensor page is now blank, the process is stuck detecting and end task process does not work as I get "access denied" this is persistent in removal and re-install of AIDA 64 ex

      can you tell me if all check boxes ticked in the stability page for the following, which one 
      ASUS WMI
      ACPI ACCESS
      ASUS ROG

      Thanks again for the help
    • By Deckard
      Hi,
      All of the system fans are no longer appearing in the sensor page Using AIDA64 extreme 5.99.4944 Beta
      RAD 1 header
      RAD 2 Header
      Chassis fan
      I cannot remember when it happend,  just noticed another post and I checked mine. same problem
       

    • By sirlock
      Hi All, 
      Firstly I love AIDA64. It is so feature rich I can't believe I used anything else for so long! I spent 5 hours yesterday fine tuning my LCD panel display on my Android Tablet!
      I am running a Threadripper System with a ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 TR4 Motherboard. 98% of the sensors are there there, there are just a few missing. For the Fans the latest AIDA Beta shows CPU and CPU OPT and CHA Fan 2. What is missing is CHA FAN 1, H_AMP_FAN, W_PUMP+ and the 3 CHA FANS on the extension board that Plugs into the EXT_FAN header.
      As I am running a TR system that runs warm it important to be able to monitor the H_AMP_FAN and W_PUMP+ connectors as that will tell me if my Liquid Cooler is operating properly. 
      Let me know if I can provide any other info or testing to help.
      Regards,
      Lachlan.
    • By Koithim
      Hey there,
      I recently upgraded my pc, i changed 3 things:
      MB: Maximus XI Extreme
      CPU: 9900k
      Cooler: Ryujin 360.
      Since then aida64 takes a very long time to start, become randomly unresponsive for random amount of time, sensor panel too. Aida64 never crash, it just become unresponsive randomly for a random time.
      I uninstalled Aida, did registry cleaning, rebooted, re-installed Aida and same thing is happening.
       
      Any help would be appreciated, thank you.
       
      Koithim
       
×
×
  • Create New...