Share your Sensorpanels

[kurcam]

and definitely last one ...

[Blur11]

On 9/19/2026 at 1:44 PM, michael69 said:

on peux télécharcher

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MJFNqcnTJtJ5gcinqN7omfBkDLQVCORD/view?usp=sharing

[grAvox]

On 3/1/2026 at 8:44 AM, IBASTIONI said:

TURZX 9.2 Inch  1920*462

could you share this please? thanks!

[ExtraktoR]

Oh my

[ExtraktoR]

20 hours ago, Exhumed said:

Copyright protection arises automatically upon creation of the work. This copyright lasts for a maximum of 70 years. This is inherent to the nature of the work, whether it be an oil painting, an embroidery, or a digital design.

Oh my. Puleeeze. I am not a lawyer. Just goole it.

Not just calling you out Exhumed. 

Yes. If it can be, and you actually copyright it. Go spend the money and try. At the very least; make a copy and send it to yourself via registered mail. Then hope for the best. Without spending cash, that is the best you get. 

With all respect. If you guys are so worried about your IP, find a different and more secure platform. Jeeeeeeze.

These panels (files) are presented and posted as open source. Were is your protection within?

"Canada has a specific exception for non-commercial user-generated content, section 29.21 of the Copyright Act.

It says that an individual can use an existing work that has been made available to the public to create a new work, and can authorize an intermediary to disseminate the new work, provided several conditions are met.

The conditions include:

1. The new work is used solely for non-commercial purposes.
2. The source/author is identified where reasonable.
3. The person had reasonable grounds to believe the original work wasn't infringing copyright.
4. The new work doesn't have a substantial adverse effect on the original work's exploitation or potential market and isn't a substitute for it."

 

[BHSY]

If my post is considered irrelevant or off‑topic, please feel free to remove it.

Sharing a quick fact on copyright: 

Copyright protection is automatic when a work is created; there's no need to spend money or mail yourself a copy. Registration can help enforcement, but it isn’t required. Sharing something for free doesn’t make it “open source” or give others the right to repost; the work remains copyrighted. Even on forums or other media, creators are entitled to enforce that.

In some cases, other forum and media admins have removed reposts of other people’s work, whether originally shared for free or sold, out of respect for copyright.

The law does allow individuals to create and share derivative works under certain conditions, but that doesn’t override automatic copyright, nor does it permit reposting without consent. It’s not a blanket permission to repost or redistribute someone else’s files.

Copyright law applies regardless of platform; posting on a forum or other media doesn’t strip rights. The only difference is enforcement: on a public forum, it’s harder to control redistribution, but copyright still exists.

This matters here because sensor panel designs are creative works, and copyright applies to them as well.

Just sharing what I know; end of note; no further discussion.

Edited 23 hours ago by BHSY

[Loyd]

4 hours ago, BHSY said:

If my post is considered irrelevant or harassment, please feel free to remove it.

Sharing a quick fact on copyright: 

Copyright protection is automatic when a work is created; there's no need to spend money or mail yourself a copy. Registration can help enforcement, but it isn’t required. Sharing something for free doesn’t make it “open source” or give others the right to repost; the work remains copyrighted. Even on forums or other media, creators are entitled to enforce that.

In some cases, other forum and media admins have removed reposts of other people’s work, whether originally shared for free or sold, out of respect for copyright.

The law does allow individuals to create and share derivative works under certain conditions, but that doesn’t override automatic copyright, nor does it permit reposting without consent. It’s not a blanket permission to repost or redistribute someone else’s files.

Copyright law applies regardless of platform; posting on a forum or other media doesn’t strip rights. The only difference is enforcement: on a public forum, it’s harder to control redistribution, but copyright still exists.

This matters here as well because sensor panel designs are creative works, and copyright applies to them as well, specifically to works created from scratch, not to material directly reused from external sources.

Just sharing what I learned; no further discussion.

"Just sharing what I learned; no further discussion."

Want to bet?

 

[PowerAlec51]

On 9/13/2026 at 1:18 PM, wahabe said:

1024 x 600 

That's really cool, could you share it in 1920x1080?

[ExtraktoR]

1 hour ago, PowerAlec51 said:

That's really cool, could you share it in 1920x1080?

Here is the original

WeakPanel2_1024x600.rar

[Exhumed]

On 9/26/2026 at 10:19 AM, ExtraktoR said:

Oh my. Puleeeze. I am not a lawyer. Just goole it.

Not just calling you out Exhumed. 

Yes. If it can be, and you actually copyright it. Go spend the money and try. At the very least; make a copy and send it to yourself via registered mail. Then hope for the best. Without spending cash, that is the best you get. 

With all respect. If you guys are so worried about your IP, find a different and more secure platform. Jeeeeeeze.

These panels (files) are presented and posted as open source. Were is your protection within?

"Canada has a specific exception for non-commercial user-generated content, section 29.21 of the Copyright Act.

It says that an individual can use an existing work that has been made available to the public to create a new work, and can authorize an intermediary to disseminate the new work, provided several conditions are met.

The conditions include:

1. The new work is used solely for non-commercial purposes.
2. The source/author is identified where reasonable.
3. The person had reasonable grounds to believe the original work wasn't infringing copyright.
4. The new work doesn't have a substantial adverse effect on the original work's exploitation or potential market and isn't a substitute for it."

 

Let's analyze this concretely, since you believe you are right and I am wrong. Therefore, I asked Grok AI to compare both statements and determine who was right. Surprise. I already knew that, but since you insisted, here you go.

What Exhumed says (correct):

• Copyright arises automatically upon creation (or fixation in a perceptible form) of the work — without registration, without formalities. This applies in all countries that have joined the Berne Convention (almost all, including the USA, Canada, EU, etc.).
• The term of protection is, in most relevant countries (USA, EU, Canada, etc.), the life of the author + 70 years. For anonymous works, pseudonymous works, or “works made for hire,” it is often 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation (whichever expires first). The phrasing “maximum of 70 years” is a bit imprecise/abbreviated, but the core point (automatic + long duration) is correct.

This applies to oil paintings, embroideries, digital designs, etc., as long as they are original and fixed.

What the reply below says (mostly wrong or misleading):

• One would have to “copyright it,” spend money, or send a copy to oneself by registered mail (“poor man’s copyright”). This is a myth. The registered-mail method has no legal effect and is not a substitute for registration. Registration is optional and provides advantages in some countries (e.g., USA) for lawsuits and damages, but it is not a prerequisite for the protection to arise.
• The reference to “open source” and the Canadian exception does not change the automatic protection of the original work.

The Canadian section (Section 29.21 of the Copyright Act) is correctly quoted:

There is indeed a specific exception for non-commercial user-generated content. An individual may, under certain conditions, use an existing work that has been made available to the public to create a new work and authorize an intermediary to disseminate it, provided that:

1. it is used solely for non-commercial purposes,
2. the source/author is identified where reasonable,
3. the person had reasonable grounds to believe the original work was not infringing copyright,
4. the new work does not have a substantial adverse effect on the original work’s exploitation or potential market and is not a substitute for it.

This is a real Canadian special rule (since 2012) that strengthens fair-use-like user rights for UGC. However, it does not override the automatic copyright protection of the original work and does not permit unrestricted commercial use or circumvention.

Conclusion: Exhumed is correct on the core point (automatic protection, long duration). The reply below mixes myths about “copyright registration” with a real Canadian exception and is inaccurate on the point it addresses. Depending on the context (platform, country, whether the files are actually under an open-source license), practical enforceability can still be difficult — but that does not change the legal foundation.

Off-topic discussion is now over. Please return to the actual thread topic: Share your sensor panels.