-
Posts
12439 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
554
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Fiery
-
Thank you for the dumps. I've just sent you a private message about this.
-
Ability to change item labels for external applications
Fiery replied to mol's topic in Hardware monitoring
Changing labels for External Applications is not possible at this time -- but you can hide the labels if you want. We may add the labels configuration feature sometime next year. Regards, Fiery -
Thank you for the data, and I'm sorry for the delays. Can you please post 2 another ISA Sensor Dumps, both made before sleep, when DIMM voltage is shown as 2V? One dump at default 1.50V DIMM voltage, and the other at a slightly different one, like 1.55V or 1.60V. That way we can check which register is responsible for holding the DIMM voltage value. Thanks, Fiery
-
Access Violation error messages, and random system freezing
Fiery replied to Darien's topic in Bug reports
If you have the option Enable CPU throttling measurement (in AIDA64 / main menu / File / Preferences / Hardware Monitoring) enabled, then try to disable that option and see if it fixes the issues. Regards, Fiery -
ACPI Tool was never a public or official feature of AIDA64, but more a debugging tool to help us find issues in AIDA64 related to certain ACPI BIOS bugs. It has been removed from AIDA64 at v4.00. Regards, Fiery
-
We can add eDrive detection once it gets included in the ATA specification. Unless of course there's an alternative method of detecting that capability -- but we have no information on that at this time. Regards, Fiery
-
There's no logging in the AIDA64 System Stability Test simply because the elapsed time doesn't change the fact that the system is either stable or unstable If the computer can't stand the stress test for 5 seconds, it is considered unstable -- but it's also unstable if it can run it for 5 hours and only after then it fails But, you can activate the Logging facility of AIDA64 (main menu / File / Preferences / Hardware Monitoring / Logging) to track various system parameters while running the Stability Test. Regards, Fiery
-
I'm sorry for the delays. We've done quite a few test runs on similar configurations in our test labs, but couldn't reproduce the issues The only thing "suspicious" about your system configuration is the Rampage IV Extreme mobo, which has support for AI Suite II. Do you have that software installed? Or, if not, then do you happen to have the AI Suite services still installed and running? Please note that since Asus refuses to implement the necessary synchronization techniques in AI Suite, it may collide with AIDA64 sensor measurement code and cause all sorts of issues that may lead to sensor values dropout. If possible, please uninstall AI Suite, and verify if it has any services left after its uninstallation. FYI, for unknown reason even after uninstalling AI Suite it leaves a few services installed and running, that will still keep polling sensors and collide with other monitoring applications like AIDA64
-
New GPU VRM Items with latest beta + nvidia 320 series driver
Fiery replied to D-E's topic in Hardware monitoring
We've done a lot of improvements to the CHiL and ONSemi sensor chip functions, and revamped many generic communication functions around there to make GPU sensor measurements more stable, and make the initial scanning of GPU sensor chips quicker. I'm glad that -- as a side effect -- it solved the issues you've experienced -
Thank you for the update on this issue. Please note that when you enable stressing GPU(s), it's normal that during the AIDA64 System Stability Test the whole system consumes more power and runs at higher temperatures than while running a game or another stress test. You've got a very powerful configuration, but a game like Battlefield will only drive your GPUs do high levels, but not the CPU. While with the AIDA64 System Stability Test you can push all components to their limits simultaneously. Regards, Fiery
-
Nice 1st post, thank you And you've got quite a fleet of PCs
-
Yes, we do have plans about that, but unfortunately the current software stack for Corsair Link architecture doesn't allow multiple applications access the Link hardware simultaneously. Corsair said they will roll out a brand new software stack with 3rd party applications support sometime next year. As soon as their new software stack is ready, we'll get back to implementing Corsair Link support in AIDA64. Regards, Fiery
-
Does any version of Aida64 have support for AMD r9 series ?
Fiery replied to zyfer2528's topic in General Discussion
The latest beta version of AIDA64 Extreme implements full support for Radeon R5, R7 and R9 Series: http://www.aida64.com/downloads/aida64extremebuild2714szdhb5yw8gzip Regards, Fiery -
I think it is due to a BIOS programming issue. Maybe it programs the measurement unit field incorrectly, and that's why you get too low readings. We'll add OCZ Deneva 2 and Talos 2 SSDs in the next AIDA64 beta release due in a few days
-
1) What motherboard and CPU do you have? 2) What version of Windows do you have installed? 3) Are the disappearing WDC drives are internal drives or external (e.g. USB) drives? Thanks, Fiery
-
I'm not sure if the incorrect temperature readings are due to a motherboard failure, a motherboard sensor chip failure, a BIOS issue or a mixup in software/OS installation. And BTW, for such small issue I wouldn't change a motherboard. There are plenty of other sensor readings you can rely on
-
Thank you for your understanding and your support We try to get more and more AIDA64 users to subscribe to our newsletter -- that is the method to gain access to such special promotions
-
For some reason, on your motherboard both motherboard and CPU temperature readings are invalid. Even Asus AI Suite reads invalid values (check the Asus ATK0110 section in the dump above). We cannot fix such issues from AIDA64 -- but fortunately you will still have the core temperature readouts to let you track the CPU temperature Regards, Fiery
-
Go to AIDA64 / main menu / File / Preferences / Hardware Monitoring / OSD / OSD Items, select any of the items (or multiple items using Ctrl key), and press the Configure button. You can change label, font name, font size and font style of any OSD item that way. Regards, Fiery
-
about i7-4960x‘s memory write benchmark
Fiery replied to seawolf1's topic in Benchmarking, system performance
It could be due to a pecularity of the IMC (integrated memory controller) of your processor. Maybe the benchmark hit a bottleneck, or there's a memory interface instability at DDR3-2400 using the seemingly strict memory timings you've configured. Can you please post a similar screen shot, with the memory running at DDR3-1866? Thanks, Fiery -
Steam would be just another platform where you could acquire a license for AIDA64. It doesn't mean the current Online Store would be discontinued
-
The hardware failure message specifically means the stress testing module detected a CPU processing error. It may be caused by a CPU execution glitch, a cache issue or if something happened while the data "travelled" from the memory into the CPU. It's not easy to diagnose such issues, and I'm afraid it's not possible to be more specific. However, please note that the hardware failure message has nothing to do with the measured thermal state, voltage levels or fan speed status of your system. Those measured values are only shown for you as a reference, and when they go out of a specific range, the test will not stop. The test will only stop if the overall system state becomes so critical that a detectable hardware failure occurs. But even that it quite rare, since most unstable systems would throw a BSoD, freeze, or make an instant system restart when a hardware failure occurs. You can hardly ever see a hardware failure message, since the odds of a single CPU processing error is much lower than such a system stability issue that completely crashes and halts the execution pipeline of the CPU (when the CPU simply resets itself along with a sudden system restart). As for Process Lasso, I'm not sure what exactly does it do that it can manage to interfere with other processes and cause a CPU processing glitch in them, but it sounds quite dangerous, so it would be best if you stayed away from having it running while using the AIDA64 System Stability Test Regards, Fiery
-
I'm sorry, but we have no plans to offer such added flexibility to the SensorPanel. We've specifically made it possible to use a background image so that you can draw such image that you're looking for, and apply it to the background. I believe by offering something in between the 2 existing SensorPanel background configuration options (solid background color, background image) would be redundant. Regards, Fiery
-
The 4x6 font used by Rivatuner and Afterburner isn't a real font, but a sort of a hand-drawn emulated font that only supports a single code page and is limited to a fixed set of characters. I'm afraid we currently have no plans to implement such a thing in AIDA64. Regards, Fiery
-
Aida64 v3.20.2656 beta + W8.1Prox64 freezes system when streaming media.
Fiery replied to owcraftsman's topic in Bug reports
Please note that if you use the AIDA64 ZIP packages to upgrade or downgrade to another version, then all your existing settings and license files will all be retained. If you however are still unsure about that, then just extract the ZIP content into a new, empty folder, and run AIDA64 from there. But it's still very important to extract the whole ZIP content into a folder, since only that way you can use all capabilities of AIDA64, including e.g. its kernel driver and data files. You can also perform a backup of your existing SensorPanel and OSD settings anytime, if you backup the AIDA64.INI file from your AIDA64 installation folder. As for the GPU stress test... Refinement is of course possible, but it doesn't change the fact that using a GPGPU workload it is only possible to load GPUs in the way AIDA64 currently does. In the future we may come up with another solution that would also stress the primary GPU via an additional Direct3D workload as well, but on iGPU systems like Haswell it wouldn't bring more overall CPU load than the current solution, simply because the way the CPU and iGPU power domains are designed. For example, on high-end Haswell parts you can achieve the highest power draw and highest thermal stress by not using the iGPU at all. So on Haswell it doesn't really matter how the GPU stressing works
